On Feb 17, 2012, at 3:51 AM, Jun Heider wrote:
>
> I agree with Bertrand. I propose we remove the [DECISION] marker in favor of
> having a [LAZY] marker to handle lazy consensus:
> http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html#LazyConsensus
>
> Main reason, is ability to skim the ML when you're
On Feb 17, 2012, at 3:50 PM, Omar Gonzalez wrote:
> Im fine with removing it.
>
> We should also add [LAZY] to it with a description.
>
> I'll add both later tonight to the wiki to give time to anyone that may be
> opposed.
>
> -omar
Omar,
Based on the 72 hour I think we need to wait till Mo
Im fine with removing it.
We should also add [LAZY] to it with a description.
I'll add both later tonight to the wiki to give time to anyone that may be
opposed.
-omar
+1
On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 12:14 PM, Doug Arthur wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 5:53 AM, Giorgio Natili
> wrote:
> >
> >>
> >>I agree with Bertrand. I propose we remove the [DECISION] marker in favor
> >>of having a [LAZY] marker to handle lazy consensus:
> >>http://www.apache.org/foundation/
On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 5:53 AM, Giorgio Natili wrote:
>
>>
>>I agree with Bertrand. I propose we remove the [DECISION] marker in favor
>>of having a [LAZY] marker to handle lazy consensus:
>>http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html#LazyConsensus
>>
>>Main reason, is ability to skim the ML whe
>
>I agree with Bertrand. I propose we remove the [DECISION] marker in favor
>of having a [LAZY] marker to handle lazy consensus:
>http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html#LazyConsensus
>
>Main reason, is ability to skim the ML when you're busy and look for
>either [VOTE] or [LAZY]
>
>Anyone o
On Feb 17, 2012, at 3:41 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've just added a note to
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLEX/Getting+Started, IMO
> the [DECISION] marker is not needed and should be removed.
>
> The standard tag for lazy consensus is [LAZY], and there's [VOTE]
