> From: Brent Arnold [mailto:br...@brentarnold.com]
> Sent: 03 February 2012 17:23
>
> The Flex community is a very opinionated group. Wait til we get to the
discussion on Singletons...
What discussion? They are evil and must go ... oh wait, other folk won't
agree with this will they, even though
The Flex community is a very opinionated group. Wait til we get to the
discussion on Singletons...
:-)
On 2/3/12 10:14 AM, Rui Silva wrote:
Agreed. I wonder if we'll have this depth of discussion when we get to the
interesting bits about code and framework?
Agreed. I wonder if we'll have this depth of discussion when we get to the
interesting bits about code and framework?
Original Message
> From: "João Saleiro"
> Sent: sexta-feira, 3 de Fevereiro de 2012 15:55
> To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
>
I like any version of the logo as long as it is reasonable (and they all
are) and I don't really care it makes me remember X, or Y, or whatever,
because anything you create today makes you remember something else that
already exists. So this can turn into a never-ending discussion that
will lea
I don't see any problem with the multicolor logo. The shape is totally
different from the Windows and Chrome logo's, and the colors are no problem
either (in terms of legal issues) because otherwise there already would've
been a lawsuit between Microsoft and Google.
On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 4:31 PM,
On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 7:25 AM, Jeffry Houser wrote:
>
> On 2/3/2012 10:11 AM, Carol Frampton wrote:
>
>> I just showed the logo to the half of the Falcon team that sits next to
>> me. They liked the multi-color one the best but did say it looked like
>> Windows and Google.
>>
> I agree; which
On 2/3/2012 10:11 AM, Carol Frampton wrote:
I just showed the logo to the half of the Falcon team that sits next to
me. They liked the multi-color one the best but did say it looked like
Windows and Google.
I agree; which is why I'm against using that logo. I think the
leaning towards the mu
