Hi,
here are some poll anwers. For the question 6e resp. 6f - I'd prefer
solution with proper license handling, but tight integration with local
maven repo might be quite overhead (like it will offer feature to upload to
nexus/artifactory?). Remote mvn repo proxied by local artifact cache (as we
u
woohoo :) great & thanks for ur work!
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 9:04 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
> Today we finally got the last blocking legal issue resolved and are now
> hunting down executives to sign the appropriate documents to submit the
> source code for MXMLC to Apache. The final signature has
>
>
> Uhm, wait. I thought Apache wasn't interested in abandoned code dumps.
> There are no developers behind this, there are no updates and the author is
> saying he is not interesting in maintaining it. I like Joe and Alex, they
> have done a lot for us, but is this really the direction we want t
well - as FlexSDK is mostly "component kit", it would be IMHO beneficial,
to have some optional packages, that could host these "extra" kind of
components. (like data visualization is separate)
Your ideas, comments?
On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 6:22 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
>
>
>
> On 3/1/12 8:55 AM, "
