On 12 Jun 2012, at 15:24, Jeffry Houser wrote:
> It is listed as being included in the Master Collection and the Creative
> Cloud on this page:
> http://www.adobe.com/products/creativecloud/buying-guide.html
> Was it different with CS5.5?
It used to be included in CS Web Premium. Now Web and de
On 3 Apr 2012, at 08:17, Justin Mclean wrote:
> This URL now exists:
> http://fpdownload.macromedia.com/pub/flashplayer/updaters/11/playerglobal11_2.swc
> However this URL:
> http://fpdownload.macromedia.com/pub/flashplayer/updaters/11/playerglobal11_0.swc
> Is still exactly the same file (ie the
On 10 Mar 2012, at 14:29, Jaykishan Patel wrote:
> i want to help Apache
start here:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLEX/Getting+Started
On 10 Mar 2012, at 15:31, Martin Heidegger wrote:
> There is a reason why I wrote the "Getting Started" area in the wiki. It
> should answer exactly what you asked for.
> *Please read the wiki*
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLEX/Getting+Started
I suggest using the standard signature cut line (dash dash space). Some mail
tools see that and not include in replies...
--
Getting started:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLEX/Getting+Started
Mailing list search, subscribe, unsubscribe, digest and help links:
http://incubator.apac
On 27 Feb 2012, at 09:26, David Arno wrote:
> no email footer.
I do think Betrand's suggestion in the original post would cover everything
without being too intrusive. I think most of the other items suggested
could/should/do probably live on that page, or be links from that page. I'd
prefer
Can we limit the footer to 2 or 3 items at most?
Or it's going to be longer than a lot of the messages.
On 20 Feb 2012, at 16:56, Omar Gonzalez wrote:
> 1.) security and 2.) Flash Player RSL caching at a global
> level (all domains),
> Having Apache host RSLs would help us to
> resolve #1 as Adobe will no longer host our RSLs. I hope that's clear and
> that I've gotten that all correct, someone co
On 20 Feb 2012, at 15:30, Haykel BEN JEMIA wrote:
>> Although: I suspect with effort, it is possible for suitably skilled for
>> man-in-the-middle attacker to intercept the loader SWF and replace the
>> byte-code storing the MD5 values their own and still inject badLibrary.
> What about storing t
On 20 Feb 2012, at 13:19, David Arno wrote:
>> * can i get a badLoader into the application
> Probably. After all, what happens if someone spoofs the apache flex download
> site and provides a dodgy version of the SDK? But that's a whole different
> issue.
Yeah, though signed RSLs currently prot
On 20 Feb 2012, at 12:41, Paul Evans wrote:
> * Can I 'man-in-the-middle' and inject badLibrary with corresponding md5 to
> make it look good - i.e. spoof the central repository
> * can i get a badLoader into the application
more specifically... If attacker succeeds in t
On 20 Feb 2012, at 11:50, David Arno wrote:
> If we generate MD5 hashes for the SDK SWCs,
> then the loader could check those hashes on load. Would that not be secure
> enough, or is there a flaw in that idea?
i don't know enough about security, but in probing for flaws in that idea I'd
approac
On 20 Feb 2012, at 11:07, Martin Heidegger wrote:
> The Flashplayer does cache swfs if they come from the same domain.
No, the browser caches SWFs, not flash player.
On 20 Feb 2012, at 12:04, Martin Heidegger wrote:
> The flash player caches the signed RSL's differently.
Yes, but flash player
On 20 Feb 2012, at 09:54, David Arno wrote:
> The idea that Haykel was suggesting though would be to avoid serving it from
> individual hosts and to serve it globally instead. That way the browser only
> has to cache it once, not once per domain. There would be cross-domain
> issues, but I thi
On 2 Feb 2012, at 11:39, Tomasz Maciąg | Fuse Collective wrote:
> Everyone could just express their feelings
They look great.
+1
On 25 Jan 2012, at 13:31, Jeffry Houser wrote:
> Perhaps as part of a welcome message when new users subscribe that is sent
> only to the user who just subscribed
On 24 Jan 2012, at 09:15, John Fletcher wrote:
> the proposal is to configure the list
> server to add this tag to the subject line automatically
Fair point. I don't doubt the good intent of the suggestion and i was abrupt in
my reply, but...
I do think it would remain unnecessary noise. Noise
+1 #42
-1
On 23 Jan 2012, at 17:09, nithya flex wrote:
> Rather than filtering, adding Tag is good.
Bad
ID 02: 1pts
ID 14: 2pts
ID 29: 2pt
On 18 Jan 2012, at 16:56, Peter Elst wrote:
> wow, really - potentially a Flex 4.6.x released under the Adobe name? Not
> sure what to think about that, was under the assumption no Flex was
> completely under Apache now.
For as long as there are support contracts in effect, I'd guess Adobe might
On 13 Jan 2012, at 12:27, Denis Kristianto wrote:
> @ Paul
> idea is worth the try ..:), I will try. thanks paul ..:)
My comment was what I saw in abstract with the circle-break in-place - no
action needed against my comment. :)
On 13 Jan 2012, at 11:23, Matthew Poole wrote:
> the tips are the hands of the
> community
and feet? = star-jumps :)
On 12 Jan 2012, at 10:33, Denis Kristianto wrote:
> design depicting a community by combining the letter 'X' which represents
> the cross platform.
> *URL*
> image: http://omdenis.com/files/apache_flex2.png
> zip: http://omdenis.com/files/apache_flex.ai2.zip
Neat work, but aspects of the graphic
I prefer variation #2 - dynamic arrows
On 11 Jan 2012, at 02:04, Rui Silva wrote:
> look like we're trying really hard to find ways this project could or
> should fail
I have to say I personally didn't reach that conclusion from anything so far
written.
IMO, where people perceive issues I'd much rather they were aired and on the
> On 1/10/12 10:25 AM, "Jonathan Campos" wrote:
>
>> But if someone wants to go create an AIR based FXG/MXML skin editor, more
>> power to them.
>
> Or build their own Eclipse plug-in. Adobe will not bring back FC. If
> enough folks in the community want something like it, they are free to st
sorry, i don't think i can sign that
On 10 Jan 2012, at 17:01, Dimitri k. wrote:
> Sales were poor. People already voted with their wallets.
There is a hole in work-flow that catalyst-like functionality would fix, but
imo:
* I don't think it should ever have been a commercial product - selling
+1
On 10 Jan 2012, at 16:09, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
> it would IMO be wrong for the Flex
> project to offer a financial reward
On 6 Jan 2012, at 23:00, Carlos Rovira wrote:
> http://www.carlosrovira.com/apache-flex-logo-proposal-2.png
> What do you think? fits better with your expectations?
personally i prefer the unbroken arc
+1
On 6 Jan 2012, at 22:32, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
> I also like http://www.carlosrovira.com/apache-flex-logo-proposal.png
> a lot - the Flex name is a bit hard to read but I don't mind as it's
> very powerful graphically - IMO it just attracts attention and makes
> you read it.
i like that
ing certain domains/resources -
our RSL domain being a prime candidate.
If not, there's going to be an immediate (network) performance hit for users of
ApacheFlex.
(not a committer - sorry if this is speaking out of turn)
--
Paul Evans
http://www.creative-cognition.co.uk/
http://blog.creacog.co.uk/
On 5 Jan 2012, at 10:02, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
> IMO, the first part of http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style
> describes the efficient Apache style of "inline posting with minimal
> quoting" very well, and also IMO that's by far the style that works
> best for serious discussions on a l
33 matches
Mail list logo
