* Greg Reddin
* Igor Costa
* Iwo Banas
* Jeff Tapper
* Jeffry Houser
* Jeremy Tellier
* Jonathon Campos
+1 binding
-Original Message-
From: Nicholas Kwiatkowski [mailto:nicho...@spoon.as]
Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2012 2:14 PM
To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 1.0 - RC9
+1 (Binding)
Looking good!
-Nick
On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 2:01
9. Git Branching Model on Git now (see Note 2)
+1 (binding)
-Original Message-
From: Daniel Harfleet [mailto:dharfl...@yahoo.com]
Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2012 4:31 AM
To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Branching Strategy and SCM
9. Git Branching Model on Git now (
@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [RT] Voting Result was [VOTE][FLEX-7] package "org.apache.flex"
On 03/04/2012 23:17, Jeff Tapper wrote:
> By my reading of the rules, the first issue passes and the 2nd fails.
> As this wasn't about a commit to the trunk, I don't think the -1
By my reading of the rules, the first issue passes and the 2nd fails. As
this wasn't about a commit to the trunk, I don't think the -1's are a veto,
but a +3 would be required to pass, correct?
-Original Message-
From: Martin Heidegger [mailto:m...@leichtgewicht.at]
Sent: Monday, April 0
1) +1 [Binding]
2) 0 [Binding]
-Original Message-
From: Martin Heidegger [mailto:m...@leichtgewicht.at]
Sent: Saturday, March 31, 2012 1:06 AM
To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: [VOTE][FLEX-7] package "org.apache.flex"
I found that the discussion about the "org.apache.flex" packa
we could deprecate "validateAll()" and replace it with a
an operation name that suggests the method returns a list.
On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 9:35 AM, Jeff Tapper wrote:
> There's a couple of very minor issues I see:
>
> 1. Method now take an array and returns
This is a good example where method overloading would come in handy. But
since we don't have that what about just adding Validator.validateAll2();
which would return a Vector.? I don't think we should
change the input from Array to Vector type though, unless there's a way to
declare a Vector in MX
There's a couple of very minor issues I see:
1. Method now take an array and returns a vector seems a little
inconsistent
I was debating changing the argument to a vector as well, but haven't yet
for two reasons:
a) several developers I know will wrap their validator mxml in an
fx:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-32?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13239584#comment-13239584
]
jeff tapper commented on FLEX-32:
-
"Didn't need to open a bug because I'm
Should I reopen it, as its not yet in the proper branch? Im assuming
changes like this may get moved to a branch after a vote on a release.
-Original Message-
From: Carol Frampton [mailto:cfram...@adobe.com]
Sent: Tuesday, March 27, 2012 10:10 AM
To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject
Good enough, I created the jira issue as I wasn't sure if the discussion was
enough, glad to hear it is.
-Original Message-
From: Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com]
Sent: Monday, March 26, 2012 2:51 PM
To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: minor Validator improvement
On 3/2
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-32?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
jeff tapper resolved FLEX-32.
-
Resolution: Fixed
code checked into my whiteboard
> ValidateAll method of Validator cl
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-32?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13238602#comment-13238602
]
jeff tapper commented on FLEX-32:
-
I checked a fix for this into
https://svn.apache
Type: Improvement
Components: Project Management
Reporter: jeff tapper
Assignee: Bertrand Delacretaz
Priority: Minor
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
In my whiteboard, I just checked in a minor change to the validator class,
so the ValidateAll method will return a Vector of ValidationResultEvent
instances, rather than a generic array.Since the array cant contain
anything other than ValidationResultEvent instances, a vector makes more
sense.
lex
On Feb 15, 2012, at 5:49 PM, Jeff Tapper wrote:
> Don't forget that Flashbuilder isn't the only commercially available
> IDE for flex. Lots of other good products out there
Met vriendelijke groet,
Arnoud Bos
Artim interactive
E arn...@artim-interactive.nl
W www.artim-inter
Flash Builder (it just makes it easier?)
On 15/02/12 17:49, "Jeff Tapper" wrote:
>Don't forget that Flashbuilder isn't the only commercially available
>IDE for flex. Lots of other good products out there.
Dont forget that Flashbuilder isnt the only commercially available IDE for
flex. Lots of other good products out there.
-Original Message-
From: Fréderic Cox [mailto:frede...@exuvis.com]
Sent: Wednesday, February 15, 2012 11:46 AM
To: Apache Flex Mailing List
Subject: Re: Adobe / Apach
Allen's comment at the meeting seems to directly contradict this line from that.
Is Adobe still committed to Flash Builder?
Yes. Flash Builder will continue to be developed and Adobe will work to ensure
Flex developers can use Flash Builder as their development tool with future
releases of Flex
Reach out to adobe for clarification, I've got nothing specific to offer.
Allen Greenblatt mentioned this in the NY stop of the Flex tour.
-Original Message-
From: Fréderic Cox [mailto:frede...@exuvis.com]
Sent: Wednesday, February 15, 2012 11:12 AM
To: Apache Flex Mailing List
Subject:
There was very little detail given. I suspect that the idea of swapping out
an SDK may not exist, since the only part of the SDK it will care about are
the compiler.
-Original Message-
From: Justin Mclean [mailto:jus...@classsoftware.com]
Sent: Wednesday, February 15, 2012 10:51 AM
To: f
Hey all, just wanted to post a brief note that the Flex tour has started,
with the first event being Monday night in NY, the next one is tonight in
Boston.
The meeting was well attended, and had 3 presenters Christophe and Allen
from Adobe, and I.
Christophe stated the meeting off with an a
+1
-Original Message-
From: Peter Elst [mailto:peter.e...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, February 02, 2012 8:36 AM
To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org; jef...@dot-com-it.com
Subject: Re: Apache Flex logo colors
Personally I think we're overthinking it way too much - it looks great, I'm
sure i
Its showing up fine for me.
-Original Message-
From: Marcus Fritze [mailto:marcus.fri...@googlemail.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 26, 2012 10:22 AM
To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Webinar: Moving from Adobe Flex to HTML5 and Sencha
404...
Am 26.01.2012 um 16:05 schrieb Dav
+1 49 [Binding]
-Original Message-
From: Doug Arthur [mailto:dougart...@apache.org]
Sent: Monday, January 23, 2012 6:38 PM
To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: [VOTE] Logo contest round #2
Hello thriving community!
We have had a great Logo contest so far. There were a lot of votes
My Vote (Binding)
http://s.apache.org/af-logo-28 1 pt
http://s.apache.org/af-logo-29 1 pt
http://s.apache.org/af-logo-34 1 pt
http://s.apache.org/af-logo-40 1 pt
http://s.apache.org/af-logo-49 1 pt
+1
-Original Message-
From: Dave Fisher [mailto:dave2w...@comcast.net]
Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2012 5:09 PM
To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [Discuss] Logo Designs
(PPMC hat) I did a quick review of last week's thread.
Do we have general consensus on the following:
(
If memory serves, a few of us kicked the tires on the idea while having
beers at Max 2010, but nothing official was started publicly until 360flex
-Original Message-
From: Jeffry Houser [mailto:jef...@dot-com-it.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2012 11:57 AM
To: flex-dev@incubator.apache
Look in the negative space between the e and x in their logo
-Original Message-
From: Dany Dhondt [mailto:archeme...@mac.com]
Sent: Monday, January 16, 2012 2:47 PM
To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org; jef...@dot-com-it.com
Subject: Re: [LOGO] Robert Cesaric
Jeffry,
What logo do you mean?
+1 (binding) im with jonathan on this
-Original Message-
From: Jonathan Campos [mailto:jonbcam...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 12, 2012 1:28 PM
To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] PPMC members to decide voting procedure
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 12:12 PM, Michael Sc
+1
-Original Message-
From: Jun Heider [mailto:j...@realeyes.com]
Sent: Monday, January 09, 2012 12:12 PM
To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: committing .* files
+1 to what Campos said. That's what README are for.
On Jan 9, 2012 9:01 AM, "Roland Zwaga" wrote:
> +1! :)
>
> O
While Blaze would make most sense as its own project, I agree with Alex's
assessment that it would be better to bring it in under this, rather than
have it die on the vine if there are not adequate contributors to get it as
its own.
-Original Message-
From: Anne Kathrine Petterøe [mailto:y
Largely, its very large enterprise applications which were started before the
4.0 release, and the cost/benefit analysis has shown they would not see a
return on their investment from an upgrade to 4.x
Many of our clients have upgraded old applications, but some have not, and are
not likely to
>Valid points.
>Maybe it was more the talk about 3.5 Apache release that made me worried we
>waste some steam on things nobody would use.
For what it is worth, We still have a number of clients using the Flex 3.x SDK
Any idea how long till adobe commits the code?
On Jan 4, 2012 7:44 PM, "Alex Harui" wrote:
> I’m loving the ideas and energy on this list so far. And so, the subject
> question needs to be answered: What should we (the committers in this
> project) do first?
>
> I recall from the summit that a
I am an initial committer for Flex. Please create an @apache.org
account for me. I'd like the user id jeff.
Thanks.
37 matches
Mail list logo
