> 1) Keep the current package names in the first Apache Flex release 4.8
+1
> 2) Change the package names in the first major Apache release 5
+ 0
Hi All,
We have to build something from this crazy announcements.
Actually I have a complete web conferencing solution (including screen
sharing) that is already open source, someone is interested to help me to
create a new Apache Flex based solution?
The idea obviously is to keep it open source..
?
Giorgio Natili
Twitter + skype: giorgionatili
On 3/24/12 3:08 AM, "Rick Winscot" wrote:
>...or tweet a digest of daily activity?
+1
I believe that too much tweets about commits are not attractive at all,
what should be great is to have a couple of tweet per day that put in
evidence the most interesting discussions / decisions from the ma
Hi,
Can you stream it over connect?
Giorgio
On 2/28/12 7:20 PM, "JP Bader" wrote:
>We're meeting up tomorrow evening to talk with Christophe Coenraets
>and Michael Labriola to discuss Flex, Spoon, Apache, Adobe, and you!
>
>If you're within a 150 mile radius of Chicago, come check it out.
>It'
>
>I agree with Bertrand. I propose we remove the [DECISION] marker in favor
>of having a [LAZY] marker to handle lazy consensus:
>http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html#LazyConsensus
>
>Main reason, is ability to skim the ML when you're busy and look for
>either [VOTE] or [LAZY]
>
>Anyone o
Quick note about the "small steps"... What's about doing first a release
and then discuss things that make sense?
I don't see a great benefit in targeting javascript, I read a lot about
OOP in javascript and the most I read the most I believe that it's not the
way to use or think to it.
G.
On 2/6/12 7:45 AM, "Bertrand Delacretaz" wrote:
>
>I suggest adding just this:
>
> --
> See http://incubator.apache.org/flex/mailing-lists.html for information
> about this mailing list, including subscribe/unsubscribe instructions
I would love to see in the footer also these two
How To Ask
I understand the frustration but can we move on and concentrate on Flex?
G.
>Can we just add this note, along with the link as a signature to every
>email that comes through the list? I've taken this approach in some
>mailing lists I manage and this minor step improved things in a big way.
I agree, this should be the right place for this link.
:)
>When people subscribe to the Mailing List, the Welcome email could be
>customized to show links to: basic rules (both generic-Apache and
>Flex-specific), resources (JIRA, SDK repository, Wiki, etc), and a FAQ.
I agree too, also if I was the one that make the proposal of the daily
message, the li
>I'm can provide the slides if anyone want to use them as a basis for a
>talk.
Yeas please!
>+1 for a morning welcome with posting rules. It usually takes two weeks
>for something to become a habit...
Can everyone that believe it's useful send me off-list the tags that have
in mind? I will mix them up and make a proposal for a welcome message to
send each morning.
G.
12 8:55 AM, "Giorgio Natili" wrote:
>Hi All,
>
>I don't know if it has been already discussed but I guess that some
>subject tagging rules can help a lot discussions to be well organized and
>easy to search.
>For instance we can have the following tags
>
>[Disc] =
#40 +1
>As Keith has expert knowledge in this area I would really like to see you
>work with him on this if you can.
>
>--
>Jonathan Campos
Thanks Jonathan, I will ping later Keith to work on it (obviously if
everybody agrees)...
Peace.Code.Flex
G.
>What is the protocol for an for Adobe branded user groups to be listed
>on an Apache Flex User groups page? I notice that all the groups listed
>for Hadoop specifically mention it in their names.
This is a very good point, we have to define a protocol and some small
rules in order to make the g
Thanks! giorgionat...@apache.org
>
>Any other user group groups and user group managers out their interested?
I'm interested and you can count on my help!
Giorgio
On 1/23/12 12:35 PM, "David Arno" wrote:
>> From: Martin Heidegger [mailto:m...@leichtgewicht.at]
>> Sent: 23 January 2012 11:00
>> I think this sort of questions are important right now as the lack of
>answers
>> seem to agitate the group and throttle the motivation.
>> I also think that thes
>Benefits :
>
>1) maintaining inheritance with older versions of SDK while writing an
>entirely new framework;
>2) lightweight components based on UIComponent;
>3) lightweight jobs for sdk managers;
>4) smaller memory foot print compared to previous versions;
>5) high customization of components fo
David please, follow Erik suggestion... Is the time to be constructive and
calm, we have now the responsibility to keep things going and in order to
do this we need good spirit and no more fights...
Giorgio
On 1/23/12 10:38 AM, "David Arno" wrote:
>> From: Erik de Bruin [mailto:e...@ixsoftware.
Hi Bogdan,
In your post you refer to this implementation as useful from an
accessibility point of view, can you clarify what do you mean exactly and
which are the benefits you see in this field?
You don't thing the pattern you described is very similar to traits?
Giorgio
On 1/23/12 9:32 AM, "Bog
Hi All,
I don't know if it has been already discussed but I guess that some
subject tagging rules can help a lot discussions to be well organized and
easy to search.
For instance we can have the following tags
[Disc] = general discussions
[Test] = automation testing / tdd
[Core] = core features d
>Use a big version jump 10? 100? 1000?
The big version jump in conjunction with Omar's proposal really make sense
to me...
>>
>Step one: grab the code and try to follow the readme and see if you can
>get
>it to build.
>Step two: do something :-)
We have to try to keep the process as much simple as possible, the
community needs to grow up again and with new developers starting using
flex the framework can grow quic
ID 8: 4pts
ID 13: 1pts
I agree to, make more sense using a style rather than controlling the
cursor with a 'global' property for all the buttons and it's true a change
in the buttonMode property can impact other components.
It's amazing to have a chance to contribute to this decisions but we have
to be careful and avoid
28 matches
Mail list logo
