Re: RIP Doug Arthur

Much appreciated idea Dimitri. A tribute to him and an encouraging step for community. -- Thanks, Amit Goel On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 11:35 AM, Dimitri k. wrote: > From: "Michael A. Labriola" >> >> Wow. He spent a lot of time trying to push this project forward and w

Re: blazeds

@Filipo: I have not much worked with GraniteDS, could you please tell the problem you faced it with Parsley annotations? Thanks. On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 2:52 PM, filippo dipisa wrote: > the problem of graniteds is that I had many problem in integrating it with > parsley that it is quite used i

Re: will ever adobe give the flashplayer to the opensource comunity

unity, I think > they > >> will > >> >>> also put efforts to extend flash. What do you say? > >> >> > >> >> If Adobe doesn't have a way to make money off Flex (or Flash for > that > >> >> matter) it doesn't matter how much growth or success the community > has. > >> >> > >> >> -- > >> >> Jeffry Houser > >> >> Technical Entrepreneur > >> >> 203-379-0773 > >> >> -- > >> >> http://www.flextras.com?c=104 > >> >> UI Flex Components: Tested! Supported! Ready! > >> >> -- > >> >> http://www.theflexshow.com > >> >> http://www.jeffryhouser.com > >> >> http://www.asktheflexpert.com > >> >> -- > >> >> Part of the DotComIt Brain Trust > >> >> > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > -- > >> > JP Bader > >> > Principal > >> > Zavteq, Inc. > >> > @lordB8r | j...@zavteq.com > >> > 608.692.2468 > >> > -- Thanks, Amit Goel

Re: AS3 and the AVM are two different things (was Flex incubation on Apache as Opensource)

fair enough :) On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 2:49 PM, David Arno wrote: > > From: Amit Goel [mailto:agoel@gmail.com] > > Sent: 16 January 2012 08:28 > > > > Exactly the point I was talking about, that Apache community will be > having > > this limitation. Thou

Re: AS3 and the AVM are two different things (was Flex incubation on Apache as Opensource)

>That is true. We won't be able to make changes to the classes built into the AVM. Exactly the point I was talking about, that Apache community will be having this limitation. Though such changes to native classes will be rare, community might need them in future to modify. -- Thanks, Amit Goel

Re: Flex incubation on Apache as Opensource

added, and that costed that extra 1K! I am no pessimistic about Apache Flex, I do see it coming brighter day by day. Just had few concerns/doubts regarding what Adobe donated to Apache. Thanks all for making the point clearer. @Raju Bitter: Thanks for the details. -- Amit Goel On Sun, Jan 15, 2012

Re: Flex incubation on Apache as Opensource

onest opinion is not the forum for rants, nor does it do > anything to do anything to help us establish Apache Flex as an independent > and open source project. > > - Peter > -- Thanks, Amit Goel

Re: Flex incubation on Apache as Opensource

I have full faith on Apache Flex, but not on Adobe any more! On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 1:45 PM, Amit Goel wrote: > Well I think there might be other words to say it, but Adobe has to do > that. > > @Omar: > Sure we all need to stay positive about it. Apache Flex community will >

Re: Flex incubation on Apache as Opensource

Well I think there might be other words to say it, but Adobe has to do that. @Omar: Sure we all need to stay positive about it. Apache Flex community will take the Flex SDK forward, and the time is gonna tell that. Long Live Apache Flex! -- Thanks, Amit Goel On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 1:36 PM

Re: Flex incubation on Apache as Opensource

ch Adobe has already done by donating the sdk, and you and the rest of community is doing by taking it further. -- Thanks, Amit Goel On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 12:27 PM, Alex Harui wrote: > > > > On 1/14/12 10:41 PM, "Amit Goel" wrote: > > > Adobe will be donati

Flex incubation on Apache as Opensource

taking its hand back on this. I am a great supporter of Flex, and want Apache Flex to live long! -- Thanks, Amit Goel.