Re: time to help test the release candidate

On 6/24/12 10:45 AM, "Raju Bitter" wrote: > Thanks, Carol. I'll do some tests later this week. > > But I remember that it was mentioned on the list that there might be a > change regarding CFF fonts compared to the 4.6.0. Has there been any > change for that with the 4.8.0 SDK (like requirin

Re: Please add me to flex dev list so i can actively post

You can do that yourself. From the wiki you can see a list of different mailing lists you can sign up for. Send an email to that address and it will automagically sign you up. JP On Jun 24, 2012 7:44 PM, "Ashish Desai" wrote: > could you please add me to the flex dev post list so that i can ac

[DISCUSS] Make rendererDescriptionMap in AdvancedDataGrid protected to facilitate conditional merging of columns & rows

Currently the rendererDescriptionMap is private in AdvancedDataGrid and is assigned in setupRenderer(), getWidthOfItem() and getRenderer() methods. private rendererDescriptionMap:Dictionary = null; public function AdvancedDataGrid() { rendererDescriptionMap = new Dictionary(); ..

Re: [DISCUSS] Make EffectManager effects property public

That's what I thought but it only contains trigger effects. The effects dictionary contains effect instances that are registered in mx.effects.EffectInstance startEffect() and then removed with the finishEffect(). You can get the public function startEffect():void { EffectManager.e

Re: time to help test the release candidate

Thanks, Carol. I'll do some tests later this week. But I remember that it was mentioned on the list that there might be a change regarding CFF fonts compared to the 4.6.0. Has there been any change for that with the 4.8.0 SDK (like requiring an external to convert fonts for CFF)? - Raju

RE: [DISCUSS] Make EffectManager effects property public

I vote for public getter. It still keeps the property encapsulated. It will also allow no impact modification to the property in future if need arises to change this property. Thanks Ashish -Original Message- From: Justin Mclean [jus...@classsoftware.com

Re: [Mentor] Creating patches for minor changes

On 6/24/12 4:50 AM, "jude" wrote: > If you wanted to suggest a change of a property from private to public > would it be necessary to create a patch or is a bug report enough? As > non-committer speaking here. IMO, if you want to be a committer someday, create a patch. -- Alex Harui Flex SDK

Re: [OT] HTML and Flex layouts

Thanks to Justin to clarify lot of my doubts and for a good presentation. -sathyamoorthi.

Re: [DISCUSS] Make EffectManager effects property public

Effects is a Dictionary that uses an effect as the key of an entry, and only ever uses 1 as the value of an entry. If you want to know what effects are playing, can't you use the mx_internal 'effectsPlaying' property? This is an array of EffectNodes (an internal class so you wouldn't be able to

Re: [DISCUSS] Make EffectManager effects property public

Hi, > Agreed, a read-only property sounds safer. Even though it would still allow > outside parties to add or remove keys. You could add a method/setter that makes a copy of the dictionary. The AdvancedDataGriud columns getter does this (array rather than dictionary but basically the same thing

Re: [DISCUSS] Make EffectManager effects property public

> > Hi, > > > Currently the EffectManager effects property is private. This property > > shows what effects are in effect. Making this public will allow for > > diagnostics. > > Probably adding a pubic getter would be a little safer? What do other > people think? > Agreed, a read-only property sou

Re: [DISCUSS] Make EffectManager effects property public

Hi, > Currently the EffectManager effects property is private. This property > shows what effects are in effect. Making this public will allow for > diagnostics. Probably adding a pubic getter would be a little safer? What do other people think? Justin

Re: Footer

I'm all for coming up with something brilliant but for until then something like this: -- Apache Flex http://incubator.apache.org/flex/ On Sun, Jun 24, 2012 at 1:03 AM, Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > > Is anyone against adding a basic footer? > > Sound good - do you have anything in mind? > > Ju

Re: [OT] another future of Flex talk

Great presentation Atenciosamente, *Rafael Santos (CEO)* Specta - *"Delivering Business Apps"* Nos siga no twitter: @spectati spectati.com.br / facebook.com/SpectaTI On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 7:27 AM, Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, >

Re: [OT] HTML and Flex layouts

The W3C had a working group within the "Rich Web Client Activity" named "Declarative Formats for Applications and User Interfaces". Unfortunately the group stopped working in 2007, http://www.w3.org/TR/dfaui/ The goals: "This WG's Charter includes a deliverable named Specification of a declarative

Re: Changes to the homepage

> On the home page [1] can we rename the link, "Jira" to "Submit bugs and > features" > link to a page that gives information about submitting bug reports and > submitting feature requests and the process to do that? > Possibly also have links to most watched/voted on issues? Perhaps an "Issue of