Re: pedal down?

On 6/21/12 11:27 PM, "Clint Modien" wrote: > I know we've been waiting for code to be donated and the JIRA import to be > done butŠ now that those things are doneŠ I know a lot of people around the > globe are waiting in the wings and wondering how they can pitch in. > > Is it safe to update

pedal down?

I know we've been waiting for code to be donated and the JIRA import to be done but… now that those things are done… I know a lot of people around the globe are waiting in the wings and wondering how they can pitch in. Is it safe to update this page (http://incubator.apache.org/flex/get-involve

Re: [OT] Christophe Herreman third time father

You are brave man :-) Congratulations!!! -- Joan Llenas Masó CTO Garnet Works SL T. 93 848 57 27 -- @joangarnet (es) @joanllenas (en) http://joan.garnet.io On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 9:46 PM, Guthmann, Scott wrote: > > Last Tuesday morning his wife gave birth to a healthy baby boy, his name

Re: Badge installer

On 21 Jun 2012, at 16:28, Tomasz Maciąg | Fuse Collective wrote: > Those 50kb are used by embedded font which use only numerals and dot (11 > glyphs) so I can easily replace it by vector symbols in library and display > with AS3. It's looking great. Can't you embed only the 11 glyphs required

Re: Badge installer

How easy/hard is it to add more glyphs to this? Maybe we can write an ant script to make it more robust. I can help with that. But this is not a big priority right now. There won't be any need for adding extra glyphs. I'm doing this because we used different font for SDK version textfield (ope

RE: [OT] Christophe Herreman third time father

> Last Tuesday morning his wife gave birth to a healthy baby boy, his name is > Thibaut. (I hope I spelt that correctly...) > So, of you go, start congratulating ;) Congratulations!

Re: Badge installer

On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 8:28 AM, Tomasz Maciąg | Fuse Collective < t.mac...@fusecollective.com> wrote: > Finally I had some time to work on this. > I've added background with logo to FLA as vectors. This eliminated the > need for use 100kb png image. When working on that I've managed to fix logo >

Re: [OT] Christophe Herreman third time father

Mazal tov Christophe and family! On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 11:42 AM, Roland Zwaga wrote: > Hey guys, > > I think its time that all of you congratulate Apache Flex committer > Christophe Herreman on becoming a father for the third time. > Last Tuesday morning his wife gave birth to a healthy baby bo

[OT] Christophe Herreman third time father

Hey guys, I think its time that all of you congratulate Apache Flex committer Christophe Herreman on becoming a father for the third time. Last Tuesday morning his wife gave birth to a healthy baby boy, his name is Thibaut. (I hope I spelt that correctly...) So, of you go, start congratulating ;)

RE: Automated UI Tester for ActionScript

>Historically, the problems you think are important have been different from >the list of top issues I hear from the Adobe folks (and generally, my opinions >usually match better against your list). >I'm primarily interested in issues that impact Apache Flex and especially ones >that might some

Re: Automated UI Tester for ActionScript

On 6/21/12 8:18 AM, "Michael A. Labriola" wrote: > > You want me to elucidate all of the new problems Adobe should be solving to > gain market share? Don't you already pay someone for that? > Historically, the problems you think are important have been different from the list of top issues I

RE: Automated UI Tester for ActionScript

>When you explained to Adobe that it would be a bad idea simply stop >development on the Flex SDK and instead donate it to this Apache Project, >Adobe took your advice. Then, a few thousand of us [and counting] >joined this >project and began donating our time and expertise. I am saying that ask

RE: Automated UI Tester for ActionScript

Mike L: > You want me to elucidate all of the new problems Adobe should be solving to > gain market share? Don't you already pay someone for that? When you explained to Adobe that it would be a bad idea simply stop development on the Flex SDK and instead donate it to this Apache Project, Adobe

Re: Badge installer

Finally I had some time to work on this. I've added background with logo to FLA as vectors. This eliminated the need for use 100kb png image. When working on that I've managed to fix logo so it's now usable as FXG. Somehow direct export form Illustrator to FXG broke gradients... Right now the s

RE: Automated UI Tester for ActionScript

>This was done by a team working on the Flash plug-ins in Creative Suite. >Some might find it useful. >What are the "new ones" we are ignoring? You want me to elucidate all of the new problems Adobe should be solving to gain market share? Don't you already pay someone for that?

Re: [OT] another future of Flex talk

Looking forward for the link Justin -Saurabh On 21-Jun-2012 8:40 PM, "Peter Andreas Moelgaard" wrote: Great.. that would be very useful. Much appreciated… On Jun 21, 2012, at 10:02 PM, Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > The talk was well attended and went ...

[OT] 360|Min

Hey guys, just wondering, how many of you are planning to come to 360|Min in October? I'm going to be there, it sounds like a fun little gathering. -- regards, Roland -- Roland Zwaga Senior Consultant | Stack & Heap BVBA +32 (0)486 16 12 62 | rol...@stackandheap.com | http://www.stackandheap.

Re: [OT] another future of Flex talk

Great.. that would be very useful. Much appreciated… On Jun 21, 2012, at 10:02 PM, Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > The talk was well attended and went well. I wasn't able to set up an online > talk in time but I was able to record the presentation (and the sound quality > is fairly reasonable).

Re: [OT] another future of Flex talk

Hi, The talk was well attended and went well. I wasn't able to set up an online talk in time but I was able to record the presentation (and the sound quality is fairly reasonable). I'll do some minor editing to it and post a link in the next couple of days along with the slide deck. Thanks, Ju

Re: Automated UI Tester for ActionScript

On 6/21/12 6:10 AM, "Michael A. Labriola" wrote: >> I have no idea if this could be used with Flex; or if we would event want to, >> but I thought I'd point it out. > > Yep, just like with test coverage, Adobe is busy solving the problems others > have already solved and ignoring the new ones

Re: CONFIG::performanceInstrumentation / PerfUtil?

On 6/21/12 6:35 AM, "Dirk Eismann" wrote: > During my experiments with the current i18n implementation in the SDK > I noticed that the current Apache Flex source does not include the > mx.utils.PerfUtil class (referenced from within a conditional > compilation block in mx.resources,ResourceMan

Re: flexunit

Thanks a lot Mike. I am going to checkout the FlexUnit project and have a look into the code, then I will contact you off the list. On 21 June 2012 14:15, Michael A. Labriola wrote: > >It is pretty stable but for my experience it is buggy when yuo have to > test the skinnable components and/or t

CONFIG::performanceInstrumentation / PerfUtil?

During my experiments with the current i18n implementation in the SDK I noticed that the current Apache Flex source does not include the mx.utils.PerfUtil class (referenced from within a conditional compilation block in mx.resources,ResourceManager) while the Adobe Flex SDK 4.6 does include this. S

RE: flexunit

>It is pretty stable but for my experience it is buggy when yuo have to test >the skinnable components and/or the rendering phases. >Did you expirence that as well? >Does the UIImpersonator addElement with flexunit4 work for you? The UIImpersonator piece is the part I want to redo. Right now it t

Re: Automated UI Tester for ActionScript

On 21 June 2012 13:13, Jeffry Houser wrote: > > I'm not sure if people have seen this or not; but Adobe has posted (or is > in the process of posting) an Automated UI Tester for ActionScript up to > their SourceForge account. > > http://sourceforge.net/adobe/**genie/wiki/Home/

Re: Automated UI Tester for ActionScript

This is because we are just mere mortals, the work of the community is just a collage of peasantry and foul amateurism. Stop trying to interfere with the divine, you mongrel! > Yep, just like with test coverage, Adobe is busy solving the problems > others have already solved and ignoring the new

RE: Automated UI Tester for ActionScript

> I'm not sure if people have seen this or not; but Adobe has posted (or is in > the process of posting) an Automated UI Tester for ActionScript up to their > SourceForge account. >http://sourceforge.net/adobe/genie/wiki/Home/ >I have no idea if this could be used with Flex; or if we would even

AW: Automated UI Tester for ActionScript

Hi Jeffry, very interesting link :-) What I get from their FAQ, it does seem possible to use it with flex: "What kinds of SWF files are supported and what SWF files are not supported? The tool supports testing on SWF files created in ActionScript 3 that are pure AS applications containing objec

Automated UI Tester for ActionScript

I'm not sure if people have seen this or not; but Adobe has posted (or is in the process of posting) an Automated UI Tester for ActionScript up to their SourceForge account. http://sourceforge.net/adobe/genie/wiki/Home/ I have no idea if this could be used with Flex; or if we would event

Re: flexunit

Thanks for your answer. It is pretty stable but for my experience it is buggy when yuo have to test the skinnable components and/or the rendering phases. Did you expirence that as well? Does the UIImpersonator addElement with flexunit4 work for you? On 21 June 2012 00:04, Michael A. Labriola wrote