On 2/8/12 6:39 AM, "Michael A. Labriola"
wrote:
>>> I would argue that approachability for newbies is what has made HTML/JS so
>>> popular. >
> I would argue its ubiquity.
IMHO, approachability is the foundation for the popularity that paved the
way for ubiquity.
>
>>> Agreed, but IMHO, i
Keith,
Please include Pune Flex User Group (PuneFUG.org) in the list too.
Cheers,
Anand Vardhan (+91 956-1818-960)
Adobe Certified Expert,Flex 3.0 & AIR
Adobe Certified Developer, Flex 2.0
www.AnandVardhan.com
www.linkedin.com/in/anandvardhan
“Innovation distinguishes between a leader and a follo
On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 3:20 PM, Keith Sutton wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have developed a list of 40+ Flex user groups world-wide and would like to
> post a page on the wiki. For more info you can check the [Wiki][User Groups]
> discussion thread.
>
> My account is 'keith_sutton' and request editor acce
Hello,
I have developed a list of 40+ Flex user groups world-wide and would
like to post a page on the wiki. For more info you can check the
[Wiki][User Groups] discussion thread.
My account is 'keith_sutton' and request editor access.
Regards Keith
I'd be happy to, what information are you looking for?
On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 2:16 PM, Diego Fonseca wrote:
> Hi, I'm Diego.
> I'm a PHP developer in Brazil. Here in our company we use FLEX+PHP in some
> projects.
> I should want to now something about the future of the Framework Flex.
> Can you
printAsBitmap has never been... satisfying. The quality has always been a
bit blurry in my opinion.
Build your on PDF files with AlivePDF: http://alivepdf.bytearray.org/
In most cases where I've needed to create a PDF of print something out, the
output I needed was not the application screen that
On Feb 7, 2012, at 9:51 AM, Omar Gonzalez wrote:
> On Tuesday, February 7, 2012, Martin Heidegger wrote:
>> Hello everybody,
>>
>> in the sense of making progress I tried to write down the feature I want
> to implement in the compiler once the compiler source & tests are available.
>> I am not
On 09/02/2012 01:36, Doug Arthur wrote:
I've updated the front page of the wiki with some information and the
pages created so far. - Doug
Awesome! Thanks!
Martin.
On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 9:23 AM, Martin Heidegger wrote:
> On 09/02/2012 01:13, Doug Arthur wrote:
>>
>> Just making a blanking statement so people know to put their links
>> somewhere when they create new pages so that people can see them. :) - Doug
>
>
> I know :) I just wanted to state that it i
>>Given some sort of native dependency management in the framework, do we
>>really need styles?
There is some overlap. The biggest problem is the hierarchical nature of
styling adds some complexity.
Mike
Notice: This transmission is intended only for the use of the individual or
entity to whic
>>My simple mind just can't understand why we need a sophisticated multi-step
>>plan or full dependency injection. Why can't a simpler substitution pattern
>>do the job?
Alex, first, I am not sure what you think is involved in the injection
solution, but I am not sure it is more complicated. T
On 09/02/2012 01:13, Doug Arthur wrote:
Just making a blanking statement so people know to put their links
somewhere when they create new pages so that people can see them. :) -
Doug
I know :) I just wanted to state that it is in everyone's power to do that.
Its a lot of work and done togeth
On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 9:00 AM, Martin Heidegger wrote:
> On 09/02/2012 00:34, Doug Arthur wrote:
>>
>> Also, lets make sure we get those sub-links posted to the main wiki
>> page for Apache Flex [1]
>>
> Its a wiki, feel free to add it.
>
> yours
> Martin.
Just making a blanking statement so peo
On 09/02/2012 00:34, Doug Arthur wrote:
Also, lets make sure we get those sub-links posted to the main wiki
page for Apache Flex [1]
Its a wiki, feel free to add it.
yours
Martin.
On 09/02/2012 00:44, Alex Harui wrote:
I think the simplest is just adding a replaceInstance on mx.core.Singleton...
The replacement in Singleton is just reasonable if all static code was
actually handled within the singleton code. I tried to explain before:
there is more code in the statics th
On 2/8/12 7:33 AM, "Martin Heidegger" wrote:
> I am curious about the "simpler substitution": How would you do that in
> detail?
I think the simplest is just adding a replaceInstance on mx.core.Singleton
that dispatches an event with what got replaced.
And maybe some new list of mixins that g
On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 5:14 AM, Martin Heidegger wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I took the liberty to write a small "getting started" section in the wiki
> [1]. I am not sure whether or not the things I wrote are actually accurate
> but I figured that everyone is free to correct me.
>
> yours
> Martin.
>
On 08/02/2012 23:45, Alex Harui wrote:
My simple mind just can't understand why we need a sophisticated multi-step
plan or full dependency injection. Why can't a simpler substitution pattern
do the job?
The complexity always comes with the detail. I assume one could
summarize it with:
Mov
On 08/02/2012 23:39, Michael A. Labriola wrote:
I would argue its ubiquity. I don't know any advanced developer that
is excited about HTML/JS as a language. Those of us excited about it
are excited by its ubiquity and the capabilities of the VM, not the
language.
Limitations are sometimes the
8 feb 2012 kl. 15.25 skrev Michael A. Labriola:
> I am going to provide a version of the framework and compiler with a
> swappable, minimalistic injection mechanism and perhaps some basic AOPish
> concepts like compile time mixins. [...] The biggest problem in this approach
> is actually thing
On 2/8/12 1:50 AM, "David Arno" wrote:
>> From: Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com]
>> Sent: 08 February 2012 03:10
>>
>> ... And then there are some old singletons like EffectManager that still
> use
>> static methods, which should be using Singleton instead.
>>
>> And then there is the wh
>>I would argue that approachability for newbies is what has made HTML/JS so
>>popular. I think we need popularity in order to get buzz that opens
>>opportunities for new work and ensures community longevity. A >>smaller
>>community of high-end specialists have an uphill battle to fight for
>
>I could be wrong but I think the plan I wrote about was a step-by-step
>instruction to get rid of singletons using a intermediate service locator that
>can be dropped in the end.
>To me the first step is to get from "unit tests are impossible" (the current
>state of the framework) to "they are
Thanks!
Martin.
On 08/02/2012 22:27, Rui Silva wrote:
Thanks Martin. There's one thing I'd change, thought and that's the
reference to [Binding] within the other thread markers. [Binding] is used
solely within a [Vote] to signal PPMC votes. I'll go ahead and take that
out. I'll also change thre
Thanks Martin. There's one thing I'd change, thought and that's the
reference to [Binding] within the other thread markers. [Binding] is used
solely within a [Vote] to signal PPMC votes. I'll go ahead and take that
out. I'll also change thread markers to All Caps as that seems to be the
usual s
Hello all,
I took the liberty to write a small "getting started" section in the
wiki [1]. I am not sure whether or not the things I wrote are actually
accurate but I figured that everyone is free to correct me.
yours
Martin.
[1] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLEX/Getting+Starte
> I absolutely agree that it's good to keep such things around.
>
> -Bertrand
>
> [1]
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLEX/Compile-time-data+injection
Makes sense to me too. The wiki page having a comments section can also be
used to hold some discussion around what is described
On 08/02/2012 18:50, David Arno wrote:
Let's have that debate. Replacing static methods with singletons will
not improve the testability of the code. If those static methods are
deterministic and have no side effects, then they are fine as static
methods (and maybe could be turned into global f
> From: Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com]
> Sent: 08 February 2012 03:10
>
> ... And then there are some old singletons like EffectManager that still
use
> static methods, which should be using Singleton instead.
>
> And then there is the whole debate about Singletons in general...
Let's have
29 matches
Mail list logo
