On 2012-02-01, at 10:55 , Erik de Castro Lopo wrote:
> I encourage the keen to do a daily checkout and build. I will be
> building it on x86 and amd64 Linux every day and running the full
> test suite. Looking for someone to do that on Mac and Windows.
I might be able to run the test suite from ti
On 2013-03-12, at 12:11 , Marcus Johnson wrote:
> now is it just a coincidence,
> considering the test files are small
It is, testing on a >6mn piece (Endless, Nameless from Nirvana's
Nevermind, 6:21) using flac 1.2.1 on OSX 10.6 I get the following:
71495116 base.wav
54517574 level-0.flac
534409
On 2013-03-12, at 20:00 , Declan Kelly wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 12:36:29PM +0100, catch-...@masklinn.net wrote:
>>
>>> now is it just a coincidence,
>>
>> It is, testing on a >6mn piece (Endless, Nameless from Nirvana's
>> Nevermind, 6:21)
>
> Does that track have a long period of sile
On 2013-12-02, at 10:52 , Brian Willoughby wrote:
> There is no quality difference between FLAC variations - compressed
> or uncompressed (unless you force a 24-bit audio file into a 16-bit
> FLAC, but that may not even be possible).
And even then, you wouldn’t be able to hear the difference
