Will you guys ever shut down or start using the Sourceforge page? It's
pretty confusing for newbz.
___
flac-dev mailing list
flac-dev@xiph.org
http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/flac-dev
Has the 2/4GB limit been fixed?
___
flac-dev mailing list
flac-dev@xiph.org
http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/flac-dev
"Using FLAC binary : /Users/Marcus/flac/test/../src/flac/flac
Original file size 441044 bytes.
Compression level 1, file size 421393 bytes.
Compression level 2, file size 421393 bytes.
Compression level 3, file size 373613 bytes.
Compression level 4, file size 369517 bytes.
Compression le
I don't think you guys should worry too much about messing up old decoders,
but no matter what you choose to do FLAC MUST REMAIN LOSSLESS.
On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 5:06 PM, wrote:
> Send flac-dev mailing list submissions to
> flac-dev@xiph.org
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the Worl
Does FLAC support 24 bit? I remember reading about people updating ffmpeg
for 24 bit support so I'm not really sure what's going on.
___
flac-dev mailing list
flac-dev@xiph.org
http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/flac-dev
"Aren't Windows users accustomed to this feature being missing anyway?"
I use Mac mostly now, but when I used Windows, now and then I always
expected the wildcard to work, it just worked on most things so it was
actually a bit of a pain in the ass when it didn't.
On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 5:35 AM,
I figured out the problem, my libtool was messed up.
___
flac-dev mailing list
flac-dev@xiph.org
http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/flac-dev
I'm using flac 1.3.0pre2 on Windows 8 (not sure which git version, the exe
was on the mailing list a few days ago) and right after I encode a 24 bit
~2 hour long flac file, to flac with -8 -e -p -V it creats a temp file
called something like .flac`enc blah blah blah, it will finish making the
file,
on managing the list at
> flac-dev-ow...@xiph.org
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of flac-dev digest..."
>
> Today's Topics:
>
>1. FLAC deletes file right after encodin
original wav is 24 bit, 8 channel, size is 41.7MB
MD5: 8d38f7dec1dbd9b4645ad6978e0a8d41
wav encoded to flac with -8 -e -p, VERY fast, 1MB in size.
MD5: 315dce07d6a30b8060d3a80d960e3a13
flac file decoded back to wav, 41.7MB MD5: 8069fc2d6cf23d08da8019e41cfbd80d
Flac compiled with make -j8 -o3, on
the audio was also 192,000khz sample rate, forgot to mention that, adn here
are the audio files, the original, the flac, and the decoded from flac.
the archive is 7zip, Idk where to upload it so I'll just send it to
depositfiles.
http://depositfiles.com/files/90anghniw
___
Also, FFmpeg encodes the audio to only 3/4th the size, that's kinda strange.
___
flac-dev mailing list
flac-dev@xiph.org
http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/flac-dev
en replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of flac-dev digest..."
>
> Today's Topics:
>
>1. Flac 1.3.0pre3 NOT lossless. (Marcus Johnson)
>2. FLAC 1.3.0pre3 NOT lossless (Marcus Johnson)
>3. Re: FLAC 1.3.0pre
Should we start thinking about including APE, ALAC, etc decoders? it'd make
encoding to flac a lot easier, and quicker, just wondering. I mean if
nothing else, FFmpeg has free decoders, and Apple released their official
ALAC codec awhile back.
___
flac-de
Compiling on OS X 10.8 x86_64 as we speak.
On Sun, Apr 28, 2013 at 3:00 PM, wrote:
> Send flac-dev mailing list submissions to
> flac-dev@xiph.org
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/flac-dev
> or, via email, sen
All tests passed, all good on OS X with make -j8 -oo
On Sun, Apr 28, 2013 at 3:18 PM, Marcus Johnson
wrote:
> Compiling on OS X 10.8 x86_64 as we speak.
>
>
> On Sun, Apr 28, 2013 at 3:00 PM, wrote:
>
>> Send flac-dev mailing list submissions to
>> flac-dev@
I'd love to fix the .Xcodeproj (which is what they're called now) but I
don't have a clue how to, if I were to figure it out would you guys accept
it, or is it not worth my time?
btw, someone on Windows should get the visual studio files working, it
always complains about not finding nasm.exe.
O
'help' to
> flac-dev-requ...@xiph.org
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> flac-dev-ow...@xiph.org
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of flac-dev digest..."
>
> Tod
I've got the Xcode project done, I'm having trouble finding the proper
format for the header search path, and do I need to include the tests in
the xcodeproj?
___
flac-dev mailing list
flac-dev@xiph.org
http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/flac-dev
One last thing, Xcode complains about the .nasm files when compiling for
x64, I don't know too much about assembly, can x86 assembly be compiled on
x64 at all?
___
flac-dev mailing list
flac-dev@xiph.org
http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/flac-dev
On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 3:00 PM, wrote:
>
> http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3428216/adding-system-header-search-path-to-xcode
Thanks guys, I got the header paths to show up, now Xcode's ust complaining
about missing parenthesis. I'm gonna try to "fix" the issue, then test in
Xcode and through
Here's the Flac.xcodeproj, compressed with 7-zip as it's just a folder and
can't be transmitted without being compressed, check to see if it works on
your computers, and hopefully everything works.
flac.xcodeproj.7z
Description: Binary data
___
flac-dev
s Visual
> Studio 6.0 from 1998.
>
> Oldest Visual Studio supported by FLAC 1.3 is Visual Studio 2005. FLAC is
> also configured to be compiled with static linking, so no external
> dependencies hinder its function.
>
> If you take a look at the following MSDN pages for Visual Stu
Are we gonna get a new beta, or will it just be 1.3 release, also how long
until the update?
On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 3:00 PM, wrote:
> Send flac-dev mailing list submissions to
> flac-dev@xiph.org
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> http://lists.xiph.
Are there precompiled binaries for OS X? if not I could provide them.
___
flac-dev mailing list
flac-dev@xiph.org
http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/flac-dev
Also, shouldn't the changelog feature the 4GB windows fix? I remember
reading about that bug fix at the start of 1.3.0, and I for one was
incredibly excited about it.
if nobody remembers it I can try to hunt down that patch on the mail list.
___
flac-dev
message --
> From: Erik de Castro Lopo
> To: flac-dev@xiph.org
> Cc:
> Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2013 18:52:38 +1000
> Subject: Re: [flac-dev] (no subject)
> Janne Hyvärinen wrote:
>
> > On 10.6.2013 22:27, Marcus Johnson wrote:
> > > Also, shouldn&
I posted Mac binaries a few weeks ago but nobody did anything with them, or
even acknowledged them.
Here is a DMG with a .pkg installer for Flac 1.3.0
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/52358991/FLACInstaller1.3.0.dmg
On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 3:00 PM, wrote:
> Send flac-dev mailing list submi
I have an Intel Mac and I'd be glad to test it for you, but I'm not sure
how to use the makefile.lite build system? do I just replace the normal one
with this one? I tried ./makefile.lite but nothing happened.
On Sun, Jul 20, 2014 at 3:00 PM, wrote:
> Send flac-dev mailing list submissions to
>
Why are you using such an old SDK? Your Macbook came with at least Mountain
Lion, right? I have a Retina Macbook mid 2012, and it came with ML...
On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 3:00 PM, wrote:
> Send flac-dev mailing list submissions to
> flac-dev@xiph.org
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via t
This ticket is spam...
https://trac.xiph.org/ticket/2140
___
flac-dev mailing list
flac-dev@xiph.org
http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/flac-dev
Isn't the FFmpeg FLAC encoder lossy for 24 bit content too?
___
flac-dev mailing list
flac-dev@xiph.org
http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/flac-dev
Do you have a source on the CoreAudio quality thing? I'd be very interested
in reading more about that.
___
flac-dev mailing list
flac-dev@xiph.org
http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/flac-dev
How the hell did this spam get through?
___
flac-dev mailing list
flac-dev@xiph.org
http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/flac-dev
I'm running El Capitan aka Darwin 15.4, I'll test the patch in just a sec.
On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 8:00 AM, wrote:
> Send flac-dev mailing list submissions to
> flac-dev@xiph.org
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinf
is it on a per subframe basis, and if so, is each frame padded if it’s not a
multiple of 512 bits? or do I have to decode all the data, and run it over the
decoded file at once?
___
flac-dev mailing list
flac-dev@xiph.org
http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/l
Oh, so you use Exponential-Golomb? I was under the impression you used old
fashioned RICE coding aka Unary.
___
flac-dev mailing list
flac-dev@xiph.org
http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/flac-dev
Unless you're offering someone $$$ to implement it, this is the last place
you should ask for such support.
___
flac-dev mailing list
flac-dev@xiph.org
http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/flac-dev
Can you guys clarify that by Rice you don't mean unary coding, but
exponential golomb coding?
that issue has confused me before, and probably others.
___
flac-dev mailing list
flac-dev@xiph.org
http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/flac-dev
I see, so it's basically Exponential-golomb, but you choose the base, and
set that somewhere.
Interesting, and thanks for the explanation.
___
flac-dev mailing list
flac-dev@xiph.org
http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/flac-dev
I reached out to clarify an issue while contributing to that document.
The email I used was: v0idstar at Apple_cloud_domain dot com
Apple_cloud_domain being a reference, not the literal domain.
___
flac-dev mailing list
flac-dev@xiph.org
http://lists.x
This is the third blank message from flac-dev, what is happening?
> On Jul 9, 2022, at 8:00 AM, flac-dev-requ...@xiph.org wrote:
>
___
flac-dev mailing list
flac-dev@xiph.org
http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/flac-dev
42 matches
Mail list logo
