David Seifert wrote:
> ---
Applied. Thanks.
Erik
--
--
Erik de Castro Lopo
http://www.mega-nerd.com/
___
flac-dev mailing list
flac-dev@xiph.org
http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo
Hello,
The project I work on, the Clear Linux Project for Intel Architecture,
regularly scans for new releases of upstream packages. On January 1, the
scans detected a flac 1.3.2 release tarball. However, when a build was
attempted at a later date (January 10), a hash mismatch was detected
between
Patrick McCarty wrote:
> Since this appears to have been a re-release of version 1.3.2, was this
> an intentional re-release?
Yes it was. The bad tarball was on on the main upload site for
a couple of hours but problems with the mirroring meant that
the bad tarball lingered on some of the mirrors
