File size is not important for me. I need audio data from wav file and
metadata in one file. How to encode a wav file to an uncompressed flac file?
Regards,
Maciej
- Original Message -
From: "Erik de Castro Lopo"
To:
Sent: Monday, December 02, 2013 8:28 AM
Subject: [SPAM] Re: [flac-de
dbPoweramp for Windows (http://www.dbpoweramp.com/) offers an encoder
with uncompressed FLAC compression. It is still completely pointless,
though.
regards,
Christoph
On 12/2/2013 9:08 AM, Maciej Mączyński wrote:
> File size is not important for me. I need audio data from wav file and
> metadat
Maciej Mączyński wrote:
> File size is not important for me. I need audio data from wav file and
> metadata in one file.
But FLAC is lossless! When you convert a WAV to FLAC, you get a file
where the decoded audio data is exactly the same as in the WAV file.
Why would you want a larger file that
I thought that an uncompressed FLAC file provides better sound quality than
a compressed FLAC file.
To Erik: How to grab the revision before this one
https://git.xiph.org/?p=flac.git;a=commit;h=fc360735ce4d1aa88a94bfccdd3bea5bdd19a8d6?
Regards,
Maciej
- Original Message -
From: "Erik
Compressing any kind of data losslessly does not reduce its quality. This
includes FLAC, zip files, or anything else.
If you're really adamant about raw WAV files and metadata, foobar2000 has
support for writing RIFF tags to a WAV file, allowing some tagging capability.
On 12/2/2013 at 1:42 AM,
There is no quality difference between FLAC variations - compressed
or uncompressed (unless you force a 24-bit audio file into a 16-bit
FLAC, but that may not even be possible). The only thing that varies
with FLAC is the size of the file. There are many ways to store the
same data, some mo
On 2013-12-02, at 10:52 , Brian Willoughby wrote:
> There is no quality difference between FLAC variations - compressed
> or uncompressed (unless you force a 24-bit audio file into a 16-bit
> FLAC, but that may not even be possible).
And even then, you wouldn’t be able to hear the difference
