1) Some time ago all project files for MSVC 6 were removed; it makes sense to
remove the code that is necessary only for MSVC 6 and older compilers.
--- a\src\libFLAC\cpu.c 2013-08-13 13:30:24.0 +0400
+++ b\src\libFLAC\cpu.c 2013-08-16 21:46:42.177485300 +0400
@@ -285,14 +285,7 @@
# ifd
On 8/21/13, lvqcl wrote:
> 1) Some time ago all project files for MSVC 6 were removed; it makes sense
> to remove the code that is necessary only for MSVC 6 and older compilers.
>
One may still compile using command line instead of a project file. Does
it really hurt keeping such code?
--
O.S.
_
Ozkan Sezer wrote:
> On 8/21/13, lvqcl wrote:
> > 1) Some time ago all project files for MSVC 6 were removed; it makes sense
> > to remove the code that is necessary only for MSVC 6 and older compilers.
> >
>
> One may still compile using command line instead of a project file. Does
> it really
Erik de Castro Lopo wrote:
> Its crufty old code. I should be removed. It makes no sense to keep
> supporting 20 year old compilers (MSVC6 was was released in 1989 and
> MSVC7 in 1992 [0]).
That's not quite accurate. MSC6 was released in 1989. MSVC was released
in 1998. So only 15 years old :).
Timothy B. Terriberry wrote:
> That's not quite accurate. MSC6 was released in 1989. MSVC was released
> in 1998. So only 15 years old :).
*MSVC6, I meant.
___
flac-dev mailing list
flac-dev@xiph.org
http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/flac-dev
Timothy B. Terriberry wrote:
> Erik de Castro Lopo wrote:
> > Its crufty old code. I should be removed. It makes no sense to keep
> > supporting 20 year old compilers (MSVC6 was was released in 1989 and
> > MSVC7 in 1992 [0]).
>
> That's not quite accurate. MSC6 was released in 1989. MSVC was rel
On 13-08-19 3:54 AM, Erik de Castro Lopo wrote:
> All the winamp2 bugs can be ignored because upstream winamp already
> contains FLAC support and we dropped the plugin from the sources
> some time ago.
Ok, thanks. I'll just close those without forwarding.
-r
_
