lvqcl wrote:
> Recently I downloaded MSVC++2005 Express Edition
That was the free (as in free beer) version, right?
> and it turns out that it wasn't possible to compile all files without
> several changes:
Is there not a later free (as in free beer) version? If there is, it
makes little sense
Ralph Giles wrote:
> As part of the ongoing move of FLAC's project hosting from
> sourceforge.net to xiph.org, we're planning to remove the issue tracker
> there. Erik doesn't check it, so issues filed there are just rotting,
> and that's a poor experience.
>
> We don't have a decent alternative
Erik de Castro Lopo wrote:
> Is there not a later free (as in free beer) version?
There are also 2008, 2010 and 2012 versions.
VS2012 Express requires Win7 to run (though it can create programs compatible
with WinXP).
VS2010 Express works on WinXP. It is possible to compile x86-64 programs wit
I noticed another problem, now with _BitScanReverse64:
--- a\src\libFLAC\include\private\bitmath.h 2013-08-16 23:02:38.869769500
+0400
+++ b\src\libFLAC\include\private\bitmath.h 2013-08-19 18:46:37.424494400
+0400
@@ -136,9 +136,9 @@
return sizeof(FLAC__uint64) * CHAR_BIT - 1 - __
In 2007, user reported a segfault in
FLAC::Encoder::File::progress_callback() when called from ~Stream().
Original report at https://sourceforge.net/p/flac/bugs/256/
Hello! Sorry, english is not my best language.
I use libFLAC++ API. I have some problems. In libFLAC API all OK.
Unhandled excep
Bug suggests using literal assignment to initialize pointers in
structures instead of calloc, to avoid pointer-representation assumptions.
https://sourceforge.net/p/flac/bugs/258/
Pointers should not be initialised by the function "calloc" if they are
a member of a bigger data structure. Would y
