Re: [flac-dev] Anything else for Flac 1.3.0?

Ulrich Klauer wrote: > Another "huge but minor" patch: Change "under difference licenses" > into "under different licenses" (in 55 files). Applied. Thanks! Erik -- -- Erik de Castro Lopo http://www.mega-nerd.com/

Re: [flac-dev] Anything else for Flac 1.3.0?

Ulrich Klauer wrote: > Another "huge but minor" patch: Change "under difference licenses" > into "under different licenses" (in 55 files). Applied, thanks. Erik -- -- Erik de Castro Lopo http://www.mega-nerd.com/

Re: [flac-dev] [PATCH] Update README

Ulrich Klauer wrote: > README still had 1.2.1 instead of 1.3.0, and a duplicate copyright line. Applied. Thanks. Erik -- -- Erik de Castro Lopo http://www.mega-nerd.com/ ___ flac-dev

Re: [flac-dev] flac 1.3.0pre3 pre-release

Dagobert Michelsen wrote: > Hi Erik, > > Am 07.04.2013 um 12:25 schrieb Erik de Castro Lopo : > > Dagobert Michelsen wrote: > >> Yes, C99 is on and according to B.2.18 from > >> http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E19205-01/819-5265/bjapp/index.html > >> also casual use. What does not work is the inclusio

Re: [flac-dev] Anything else for Flac 1.3.0?

Xiyue Deng wrote: > I have also run a `make fullcheck` on Mac OS X 10.8. Only one test fails: > > FLAC__TEST_LEVEL=1 FLAC__TEST_WITH_VALGRIND=no ./test_grabbag.sh > ./test_grabbag.sh: line 39: 1N: value too great for base (error token is "1N") > make[1]: *** [fullcheck] Error 1 > make: *** [fullc

[flac-dev] FLAC 1.3.0 has been tagged and released

Hi all, Yes, its been tagged and released. I will formally announce it in the next day or two. Thanks to everyone who contributed patches, debugging, problem reports etc. Cheers, Erik -- -- Erik de Castro Lopo http://www.mega-