[flac-dev] Flac 1.3.0pre3 NOT lossless.

2013-04-15 Thread Marcus Johnson
original wav is 24 bit, 8 channel, size is 41.7MB MD5: 8d38f7dec1dbd9b4645ad6978e0a8d41 wav encoded to flac with -8 -e -p, VERY fast, 1MB in size. MD5: 315dce07d6a30b8060d3a80d960e3a13 flac file decoded back to wav, 41.7MB MD5: 8069fc2d6cf23d08da8019e41cfbd80d Flac compiled with make -j8 -o3, on

[flac-dev] FLAC 1.3.0pre3 NOT lossless

2013-04-15 Thread Marcus Johnson
the audio was also 192,000khz sample rate, forgot to mention that, adn here are the audio files, the original, the flac, and the decoded from flac. the archive is 7zip, Idk where to upload it so I'll just send it to depositfiles. http://depositfiles.com/files/90anghniw ___

Re: [flac-dev] FLAC 1.3.0pre3 NOT lossless

2013-04-15 Thread Martijn van Beurden
On 15-04-13 17:54, Marcus Johnson wrote: > the audio was also 192,000khz sample rate, forgot to mention that, adn > here are the audio files, the original, the flac, and the decoded from > flac. > > the archive is 7zip, Idk where to upload it so I'll just send it to > depositfiles. As far as I

Re: [flac-dev] FLAC 1.3.0pre3 NOT lossless

2013-04-15 Thread Christoph Terasa
On 4/15/2013 6:03 PM, Martijn van Beurden wrote: > On 15-04-13 17:54, Marcus Johnson wrote: >> the audio was also 192,000khz sample rate, forgot to mention that, adn >> here are the audio files, the original, the flac, and the decoded from >> flac. >> >> the archive is 7zip, Idk where to upload it

[flac-dev] flac 1.3.0 NOT lossless

2013-04-15 Thread Marcus Johnson
Also, FFmpeg encodes the audio to only 3/4th the size, that's kinda strange. ___ flac-dev mailing list flac-dev@xiph.org http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/flac-dev

Re: [flac-dev] flac 1.3.0 NOT lossless

2013-04-15 Thread Martijn van Beurden
That's because FFmpeg is based on flake instead of FLAC. It seems FFmpeg outperforms FLAC here by quite a large margin, usually the differences aren't very large at all. On 15-04-13 18:47, Marcus Johnson wrote: Also, FFmpeg encodes the audio to only 3/4th the size, that's kinda strange. ___

Re: [flac-dev] flac-dev Digest, Vol 101, Issue 11

2013-04-15 Thread Marcus Johnson
Okay, I was thinking it may have been something to do with the header, but I wasn't sure how to verify that. thanks guys. On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 3:00 PM, wrote: > Send flac-dev mailing list submissions to > flac-dev@xiph.org > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit