I've just realised this missed the list. Please use 'Reply to all' to CC
the list. Thanks.
(There's also an inline reply.)
On Jun 20, 2012 8:39 PM, "Dennis Brunnenmeyer"
@
fullfidelitymusic.com>
wrote:
>
> James...
>
> Actually, I am a part-time 'real' DJ as well as an electronics engineer
with
James Haigh
> Note that 50% is silly, lossless compression is asymptotic. I 2nd Martin,
> once you have high-density entropy, there's little more 'air' to
> squeeze-out. 10-20% would be worth it if it helps adoption, although it's
> worth studying how close we already are to the asymptote of entr
On Jun 19, 2012 6:18 PM, "Ralph Giles" @
thaumas.net > wrote:
>
> On 12-06-19 10:08 AM, James Haigh wrote:
>
> > I have proposed to WebM to use FLAC in a future version. Since FLAC was
> > designed a decade ago, I was wondering if there were any new compression
> > techniques that FLAC could use in
On 12-06-19 2:59 PM, Martin Leese wrote:
> What techniques are likely to give lossless
> compression at half the file size of FLAC?
> With lossless you have an actual hard limit.
I don't know any. That's what I meant about 'hard'.
-r
___
flac-dev mail
Ralph Giles wrote:
> On 12-06-19 10:08 AM, James Haigh wrote:
>> I have proposed to WebM to use FLAC in a future version. Since FLAC was
>> designed a decade ago, I was wondering if there were any new compression
>> techniques that FLAC could use in a new version to improve compression
>> ratios.
On 12-06-19 10:08 AM, James Haigh wrote:
> I have proposed to WebM to use FLAC in a future version. Since FLAC was
> designed a decade ago, I was wondering if there were any new compression
> techniques that FLAC could use in a new version to improve compression
> ratios.
The short answer is yes,
Hello,
I have proposed to WebM to use FLAC in a future version. Since FLAC was
designed a decade ago, I was wondering if there were any new compression
techniques that FLAC could use in a new version to improve compression
ratios.
If so, it would be worth synchronising with WebM for compatibility
