This seems to date back to at least the 1998-03-26 ID3v2-00 release:
https://id3.org/id3v2-00
v1.1 didn't have this field, so it seems to originate with v2.
How bizarre. Maybe this is one of those "see if anyone reads the standard"
kind of easter eggs.
Fortunately, Xiph.org should have no proble
Op wo 28 sep. 2022 om 21:33 schreef :
> My only remaining confusion is the unexplained ID3v2-derived PICTURE
> type “A bright colored fish”, which I have asked the flac mailing list
> about before, but which of course is not of real concern to the
> specification.
I don't know either. It is really
Hi all,
A working group of the IETF started working on turning the FLAC
specification into an RFC a few years ago. The document as published on the
FLAC website was taken as starting point and improved upon.
The working group now considers this document ready to be submitted for
IETF processing t