Hi,
> Are those all Virtual Machines? If so, how do you really know that
> the performance is 3.3x?
I have access to a number of different POWER9 systems, all native.
Thanks,
Anton
___
flac-dev mailing list
flac-dev@xiph.org
http://lists.xiph.org/mailm
On Jul 11, 2018, at 5:59 PM, Anton Blanchard wrote:
> Hi Brian,
>
>> Thank you for this collection of patches.
>>
>> How can I test them? What platforms (computers) have the ppc64 or
>> POWER9 processor?
>
> The IBM Bounty Source page has a list of resources:
>
> https://www.bountysource.com/
> > How can I test them? What platforms (computers) have the ppc64 or
> > POWER9 processor?
>
> The IBM Bounty Source page has a list of resources:
>
> https://www.bountysource.com/teams/ibm/bounties
>
> Travis also has ppc64le support, so if you add the linux-ppc64le
> target then FLAC will
Hi Brian,
> Thank you for this collection of patches.
>
> How can I test them? What platforms (computers) have the ppc64 or
> POWER9 processor?
The IBM Bounty Source page has a list of resources:
https://www.bountysource.com/teams/ibm/bounties
Travis also has ppc64le support, so if you add the
Thank you for this collection of patches.
How can I test them? What platforms (computers) have the ppc64 or POWER9
processor?
Brian
On Jul 10, 2018, at 2:31 PM, Anton Blanchard wrote:
>
> The following series adds initial vector support for PowerPC64.
> On POWER9, flac --best is about 3.3x f
The following series adds initial vector support for PowerPC64.
On POWER9, flac --best is about 3.3x faster.
Amitay Isaacs (2):
Add m4 macro to check for C __attribute__ features
Check if compiler supports target attribute on ppc64
Anton Blanchard (5):
configure.ac: Remove SPE detection cod
