Re: [flac-dev] The FLAC website

2012-12-12 Thread Conrad Parker
On 14 September 2012 18:01, Martijn van Beurden wrote: > Hi all, > > I've updated the RSS feed and made the pages fetch and display that feed. > Now only the feed had to be updated to update the pages as well. > > I have included a patch, however, I've never worked with git before so I > hope ever

Re: [flac-dev] Shared library won't build when cross-compiling.

2012-12-12 Thread Cristian Rodríguez
El 22/08/12 04:03, Nathan Osman escribió: > I'm having trouble cross-compiling FLAC for Windows from Linux. > > I am using the following commands: > > ./configure --host=i686-w64-mingw32 --prefix=/usr/i686-w64-mingw32 > --enable-shared > make > > The process completes successfully but I only end up

Re: [flac-dev] Status of flac; new release?

2012-12-12 Thread Max Horn
On 13.12.2012, at 00:38, Ralph Giles wrote: > On 12-12-12 2:56 PM, Max Horn wrote: > >> Hum. Actually, I just noticed that the website is also in the flac repos >> itself, under doc/html/ > > How about that. I hadn't noticed that either! ;-). OK, so I had a closer look at the differences bet

Re: [flac-dev] Shared library won't build when cross-compiling.

2012-12-12 Thread Erik de Castro Lopo
Nathan Osman wrote: > I'm having trouble cross-compiling FLAC for Windows from Linux. I don't think this is working at the moment. Its on my list of things to fix before the next release. Erik -- -- Erik de Castro Lopo http://w

Re: [flac-dev] Status of flac; new release?

2012-12-12 Thread Ralph Giles
On 12-12-12 2:56 PM, Max Horn wrote: > Hum. Actually, I just noticed that the website is also in the flac repos > itself, under doc/html/ How about that. I hadn't noticed that either! > (Personally, I think generated doxygen docs should not be part of the repos, > but that's just me). No disa

Re: [flac-dev] Status of flac; new release?

2012-12-12 Thread Max Horn
On 12.12.2012, at 20:10, Ralph Giles wrote: > On 12-12-12 10:47 AM, Max Horn wrote: > >> If you point me to the sources of the site (is there a repos for it?), I'll >> be happy to provide a patch for this, too! > > The new site repo is https://git.xiph.org/flac-website.git Hum. Actually, I ju

[flac-dev] Information about the 8 channels

2012-12-12 Thread Yves Salmant
Hello, I'm very interested to know how are framed 8 different channels (not 5.1) in the FLAC format. Could you please explain this point and also if it is possible to extend the 8 channels to N channels as expressed in the FLAC Website (using Ogg container) ? How do you use Ogg and FLAC together i

Re: [flac-dev] Flac HiRes decoding problems

2012-12-12 Thread Klaus Schulz
Hi Eric. On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 7:57 AM, Erik de Castro Lopo wrote: > Hi Klaus, > > I'm not really sure where to start with this one. > > Klaus Schulz wrote: > > > My first post over here. > > > > While working on a music server optimzation (which ususally goes hand in > > hand with running pr

[flac-dev] Shared library won't build when cross-compiling.

2012-12-12 Thread Nathan Osman
I'm having trouble cross-compiling FLAC for Windows from Linux. I am using the following commands: ./configure --host=i686-w64-mingw32 --prefix=/usr/i686-w64-mingw32 --enable-shared make The process completes successfully but I only end up with the static library. The following files are copied

Re: [flac-dev] Questions about FLAC documentation

2012-12-12 Thread Gravis
FlacNetLib was by far the most useful code reference. if you dont know object oriented programming then you need to muddle through libFLAC as i havent seen any other implementation that isnt OO. -Gravis On Sun, Nov 4, 2012 at 1:16 PM, Serban Giuroiu wrote: > Hi, Gravis. > > I'm trying to build

Re: [flac-dev] Questions about FLAC documentation

2012-12-12 Thread Gravis
If you only have a C compiler then you were doomed to start with. :P On Sat, Oct 6, 2012 at 5:04 AM, Ivailo Karamanolev wrote: > If you only have a C compiler, how can you compile the C++ code to put a C > frontend on it? > > On Sat, Oct 6, 2012 at 2:01 AM, Gravis wrote: >> >> I'm implementing a

Re: [flac-dev] Status of flac; new release?

2012-12-12 Thread Erik de Castro Lopo
Erik de Castro Lopo wrote: > Thanks for your work on this. Really good stuff. Up on the xiph.org site now: https://www.xiph.org/flac/ Btw Martijn if you'd like your name in the actual commit in git, look at the "git format-patch" command. Erik -- ---

Re: [flac-dev] Flac and SourceForge

2012-12-12 Thread Ralph Giles
On 12-12-12 12:58 PM, Rich Bowen wrote: > Ralph's account is not currently attached to the project. Mike Wren is > attached to the project (I saw his name in the archives) but he's not an > admin, and also the email address that's attached to the account isn't > valid any more. That's correct. Jo

Re: [flac-dev] Status of flac; new release?

2012-12-12 Thread Erik de Castro Lopo
Martijn van Beurden wrote: > Okay, this is weird. I just tried to send it again, but it doesn't > appear in the archives, so I suppose it didn't make it? I don't get a > warning or error mail however. It probably has to do with the size of > the patch (as I changed the feed from an atom to RSS

Re: [flac-dev] Flac and SourceForge

2012-12-12 Thread Rich Bowen
On Dec 12, 2012, at 3:55 PM, Erik de Castro Lopo wrote: > Rich Bowen wrote: > >> Hi, I'm Rich Bowen, the Community Manager at SourceForge. > > Thanks Rich. Replied directly to you CCing Ralph Giles who > has an SF.net account. Ralph's account is not currently attached to the project. Mike Wren

Re: [flac-dev] Status of flac; new release?

2012-12-12 Thread Ralph Giles
On 12-12-12 1:13 PM, Martijn van Beurden wrote: > Okay, this is weird. I just tried to send it again, but it doesn't > appear in the archives, so I suppose it didn't make it? I don't get a > warning or error mail however. It probably has to do with the size of > the patch This was the problem.

Re: [flac-dev] Flac and SourceForge

2012-12-12 Thread Ralph Giles
Hi Josh, I know you're busy, but could you please respond, one way or the other, whether I should have access to the flac.sf.net site to point it at the recent maintainership work Erik has been coordinating at Xiph.Org? Thanks, -r On 12-12-12 1:18 PM, Rich Bowen wrote: >>> So, please let me kn

Re: [flac-dev] [PATCH 2/5] autogen.sh: replace this by a simple call to autoreconf

2012-12-12 Thread Erik de Castro Lopo
Max Horn wrote: > > + > > +# FIXME: The following logic should be part of configure, not of > > Makefile.am > > + > > if FLaC__CPU_PPC > > # The -force_cpusubtype_ALL is needed to insert a ppc64 instruction > > # into cpu.c with an asm(). > > I committed this FIXME comment by mistake, although I

Re: [flac-dev] Flac and SourceForge

2012-12-12 Thread Rich Bowen
On Dec 12, 2012, at 4:07 PM, Ralph Giles wrote: > On 12-12-12 11:18 AM, Rich Bowen wrote: > >> So, please let me know, either her on the list, or off-list, if you >> prefer, what the consensus is that you want to do. Specifically, who >> would be added to the SF project (I'd need SF user IDs). >

Re: [flac-dev] Status of flac; new release?

2012-12-12 Thread Martijn van Beurden
Okay, this is weird. I just tried to send it again, but it doesn't appear in the archives, so I suppose it didn't make it? I don't get a warning or error mail however. It probably has to do with the size of the patch (as I changed the feed from an atom to RSS format) which is 80kb I've uploaded

Re: [flac-dev] Flac and SourceForge

2012-12-12 Thread Ralph Giles
On 12-12-12 11:18 AM, Rich Bowen wrote: > So, please let me know, either her on the list, or off-list, if you > prefer, what the consensus is that you want to do. Specifically, who > would be added to the SF project (I'd need SF user IDs). Thanks for taking an interest. If Josh doesn't object, yo

Re: [flac-dev] Flac and SourceForge

2012-12-12 Thread Erik de Castro Lopo
Rich Bowen wrote: > Hi, I'm Rich Bowen, the Community Manager at SourceForge. Thanks Rich. Replied directly to you CCing Ralph Giles who has an SF.net account. Cheers, Erik -- -- Erik de Castro Lopo http://www.mega-nerd.com/ __

Re: [flac-dev] [PATCH 2/5] autogen.sh: replace this by a simple call to autoreconf

2012-12-12 Thread Max Horn
Small remark: > diff --git a/src/libFLAC/Makefile.am b/src/libFLAC/Makefile.am > index 13ab593..aa88100 100644 > --- a/src/libFLAC/Makefile.am > +++ b/src/libFLAC/Makefile.am > @@ -34,6 +34,9 @@ noinst_LTLIBRARIES = libFLAC-static.la > if DEBUG > DEBUGCFLAGS = -DFLAC__OVERFLOW_DETECT > endif > + >

[flac-dev] [PATCH 2/5] autogen.sh: replace this by a simple call to autoreconf

2012-12-12 Thread Max Horn
The autoreconf tool is provided by autoconf to do what custom autogen.sh scripts in many projects used to do. Only it is more robust and widely tested. It has been available for several years, too. No reason to rely on custom code for this. Signed-off-by: Max Horn --- Makefile.am

[flac-dev] [PATCH 5/5] configure: modernize autoconf usage

2012-12-12 Thread Max Horn
In particular: - quote several macro arguments properly - switch to the extended version of AC_INIT - replace AM_CONFIG_HEADER by AC_CONFIG_HEADERS - remove obsolete extra AC_CHECK_SIZEOF param - upgrade minimal automake version from 1.7 to 1.11 (which is when dist-xz was introduced) Signed-off-

[flac-dev] [PATCH 1/5] configure: replace XIPH_C_FIND_ENDIAN by AC_C_BIGENDIAN

2012-12-12 Thread Max Horn
Signed-off-by: Max Horn --- configure.ac | 10 +++- m4/endian.m4 | 177 --- 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 178 deletions(-) delete mode 100644 m4/endian.m4 diff --git a/configure.ac b/configure.ac index 3899d68..f206b32 100644 --- a/c

[flac-dev] [PATCH 0/5] update build system

2012-12-12 Thread Max Horn
This patch series modernizes various aspects of the autotools based build system. There is a lot more that could and should be done, but I tried to stay conservative for now and just resolve some of the most obvious issues. Max Horn (5): configure: replace XIPH_C_FIND_ENDIAN by AC_C_BIGENDIAN

[flac-dev] [PATCH 3/5] configure: always print ac_cv_c_compiler_gnu

2012-12-12 Thread Max Horn
Previously, we only printed whether the used compiler was detected as gcc if the answer was positive. Now we always print the result (but the GCC version still is only printed when we are using GCC) Signed-off-by: Max Horn --- configure.ac | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-

[flac-dev] [PATCH 4/5] configure: merge AC_CHECK_HEADERS calls

2012-12-12 Thread Max Horn
Also removed some pointless AC_SUBST invocation, which would only be necessary if the Makefiles were using the results of the header detection, which they are not. Signed-off-by: Max Horn --- configure.ac | 9 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 8 deletions(-) diff --git a/configure.ac b/

Re: [flac-dev] Status of flac; new release?

2012-12-12 Thread Erik de Castro Lopo
Martijn van Beurden wrote: > On 12-12-12 19:47, Max Horn wrote: > I already submitted a patch (see the mailinglist for the 14th of > september) to update the news section (and to make it easier to update) > but no one has replied to that yet... Sorry, I can't find that patch. Can you resend it

Re: [flac-dev] Status of flac; new release?

2012-12-12 Thread Martijn van Beurden
On 12-12-12 19:47, Max Horn wrote: > If you point me to the sources of the site (is there a repos for it?), I'll > be happy to provide a patch for this, too! I already submitted a patch (see the mailinglist for the 14th of september) to update the news section (and to make it easier to update)

Re: [flac-dev] Status of flac; new release?

2012-12-12 Thread Max Horn
On 12.12.2012, at 20:10, Ralph Giles wrote: > On 12-12-12 10:47 AM, Max Horn wrote: > >> If you point me to the sources of the site (is there a repos for it?), I'll >> be happy to provide a patch for this, too! > > The new site repo is https://git.xiph.org/flac-website.git Thanks. I'll restri

[flac-dev] Flac and SourceForge

2012-12-12 Thread Rich Bowen
Hi, I'm Rich Bowen, the Community Manager at SourceForge. I was just chatting with Fingolfin on IRC about the state of the Flac project, and I wanted to let you know that I've jumped into the fray. As Community Manager, I'm interested in the health of projects, and I spend a lot of time looking

Re: [flac-dev] Status of flac; new release?

2012-12-12 Thread Ralph Giles
On 12-12-12 10:47 AM, Max Horn wrote: > If you point me to the sources of the site (is there a repos for it?), I'll > be happy to provide a patch for this, too! The new site repo is https://git.xiph.org/flac-website.git > As a start, I verified that my own ancient patch is obsolete now, and clo

Re: [flac-dev] Status of flac; new release?

2012-12-12 Thread Max Horn
Hi again, On 29.11.2012, at 21:10, Erik de Castro Lopo wrote: > Max Horn wrote: > >> 1) Is there any chance the website could be updated? > > I'd like to have the flac.sf.net website re-directed to > https://www.xiph.org/flac/ . Until the re-direct happens > the rest of the world still points