Mr. Nice wrote:
> How I can know FFV1 is version 1.3?
Use the "-level 3" switch. More info here:
https://trac.ffmpeg.org/wiki/Encode/FFV1
If you're feeling paranoid about whether your encode was lossless or not, run
framemd5s of both files. More info here
https://trac.ffmpeg.org/wiki/framemd5
On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 15:28:33 +0100, MrNice wrote:
> So 2 questions:
> - What are the command options to add to get x264 lossless?
> -preset fast -qp 0 , only/good?
Well documented here, I believe:
https://trac.ffmpeg.org/wiki/Encode/H.264#LosslessH.264
> - How I can know FFV1 is version 1.3?
On 27/07/15 11:54, Peter B. wrote:
> On 07/25/2015 11:53 AM, MrNice wrote:
>>> The standard approach to this kind of issue is to use (as close to)
>> losslessly encoded intermediate files as possible. I.e. either use a
>> codec designed for lossless encoding such as "HuffYUV", or use something
>> l
On 07/25/2015 11:53 AM, MrNice wrote:
>> The standard approach to this kind of issue is to use (as close to)
> losslessly encoded intermediate files as possible. I.e. either use a
> codec designed for lossless encoding such as "HuffYUV", or use something
> like x264 with "lossless" settings.
> Why
The application is a bit more complex than that. The source code is
available on Github right now (https://github.com/Nolski/popcoder/ the
ffmpeg commands reside in editor.py and the process of running all of the
commands is in video.py) but since we are stitching together video, doing
overlays, re
Francois Visagie gmail.com> writes:
> I.e. either use a codec designed for lossless encoding
> such as "HuffYUV", or use something like x264 with
> "lossless" settings.
FFv1 should be superior in (nearly) every regard, for
example you would need several different x264 libraries
to support al
On 25/07/15 09:54, Francois Visagie wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: ffmpeg-user [mailto:ffmpeg-user-boun...@ffmpeg.org] On Behalf Of
>> Michael Nolan
>> Sent: 25 July 2015 01:02
>> To: ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org
>> Subject: [FFmpeg-user] Running multiple ffmpeg commands with minimal
>> lo
> -Original Message-
> From: ffmpeg-user [mailto:ffmpeg-user-boun...@ffmpeg.org] On Behalf Of
> Moritz Barsnick
> Sent: 25 July 2015 10:45
> To: FFmpeg user discussions
> Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-user] Running multiple ffmpeg commands with
> minimal loss in quality
>
&
> -Original Message-
> From: ffmpeg-user [mailto:ffmpeg-user-boun...@ffmpeg.org] On Behalf Of
> Michael Nolan
> Sent: 25 July 2015 01:02
> To: ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org
> Subject: [FFmpeg-user] Running multiple ffmpeg commands with minimal
> loss in quality
>
> Hi everyone,
>
> I'm writing a
On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 16:02:22 -0700, Michael Nolan wrote:
> do things like overlay, scale and trim videos, render text, render images,
[...]
> The biggest issue that I have is that the application that I run has to run
> ffmpeg multiple times, thus re-encoding the video(s) and making the end
> v
10 matches
Mail list logo
