-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Monday, 2017-11-13 at 22:48 -, Kevin Duffey wrote:
[quote]
If Kevin can share two reasonable sized sample files, I can try the
ffmpeg operation in my computer. Using Linux, though.
And with sufficent memory: From RAM disk to /dev/null.
On 13 November 2017 at 22:48, Kevin Duffey
wrote:
> I am not sure what you are asking..exactly. You want me to upload a couple
> large files some place for you to download and test? I would assume.. if that
> is what you are asking.. any files should work yah? The files I work with are
> 140GB
If Kevin can share two reasonable sized sample files, I can try the
ffmpeg operation in my computer. Using Linux, though.
And with sufficent memory: From RAM disk to /dev/null.
First of all.. sorry for this again.. I installed Thunderbird.. and it doesnt
appear to work well if at all with
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Monday, 2017-11-13 at 15:56 -, Kevin Duffey wrote:
[quote]
As one of the drives
is an SSD.. this seems ridiculous to me that it is basically moving at
USB2 speeds. At the very least, as it is over a USB 3.1 gen 2, 10Gb/s
wire... it should
On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 20:23:28 +0100, Carlos E. R. wrote:
> If Kevin can share two reasonable sized sample files, I can try the
> ffmpeg operation in my computer. Using Linux, though.
And with sufficent memory: From RAM disk to /dev/null.
Moritz
___
f
On 2017-11-13 17:34, Rob Hallam wrote:
> On 13 November 2017 at 15:56, Kevin Duffey <> wrote:
>
>> What sort of speeds should I see when concatting two DNxHR SQ 4K videos
>> together?
>
> That depends on the underlying hardware. Apologies
> if I missed it, but it's still unclear to me if you are
On 13 November 2017 at 15:56, Kevin Duffey
wrote:
> What sort of speeds should I see when concatting two DNxHR SQ 4K videos
> together?
That depends on the underlying hardware. Apologies
if I missed it, but it's still unclear to me if you are able
to achieve an 'expected' speed with an OS-level
[quote]
> As one of the drives
> is an SSD.. this seems ridiculous to me that it is basically moving at
> USB2 speeds. At the very least, as it is over a USB 3.1 gen 2, 10Gb/s
> wire... it should be much much faster than this. So now I am left
> wondering why my system is super slow at copying
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sunday, 2017-11-12 at 17:17 -, Kevin Duffey wrote:
back then you have been asked if you had turned off all security
monitoring for the target folder, such as Windows Defender, to which
you haven't replied. ffmpeg is per se not a signed app
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Monday, 2017-11-13 at 10:50 +0100, Carlos E. R. wrote:
On Sunday, 2017-11-12 at 16:52 -, Kevin Duffey wrote:
If you have to use the yahoo webmail interface, I'd rather prefer you
continued top-posting. Just add a note like "sorry for topp
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Content-ID:
On Sunday, 2017-11-12 at 16:52 -, Kevin Duffey wrote:
You may get further advice on this- top-posting
questions tend to draw people (like me) out
of the woodwork.
OK.. this is my attempt at bottom posting. I am using yahoo em
>
> My laptop only has USB 3, and 3.1 gen 2 ports. My SSD is in a drive bay
> connected to the USB 3.1 gen 2 port, and the reader unit is capable of
> 10Gbps connections.
>
Have you tried using TeraCopy for a comparison?
___
ffmpeg-user mailing list
ffmp
Are you sure you are using a USB 3 port?
My laptop has both USB 2 and USB 3 ports.
I use the USB 2 ports for things that aren't as speed sensitive like the
dongle for my wireless mouse/keyboard and the USB 3 ports to connect
external drives and phones for file transfer.
Perhaps you are plugged
On 11/12/2017 12:17 PM, Kevin Duffey wrote:
So this strikes me as one problem. USB 3 is 5Gb/s. Or about 500MB/s. As one
of the drives is an SSD.. this seems ridiculous to me that it is basically
moving at USB2 speeds. At the very least, as it is over a USB 3.1 gen 2, 10Gb/s
wire... it shou
back then you have been asked if you had turned off all security monitoring
for the target folder, such as Windows Defender, to which you haven't
replied. ffmpeg is per se not a signed application, which could make
utilities like such suspect there is something happening they should keep
trackin
You may get further advice on this- top-posting
questions tend to draw people (like me) out
of the woodwork.
OK.. this is my attempt at bottom posting. I am using yahoo email.. the latest
version i guess it is on. When i reply, I am at the top, and I now see the
original message collapsed.
> So I feel like I am missing something.
Kevin,
back then you have been asked if you had turned off all security monitoring
for the target folder, such as Windows Defender, to which you haven't
replied. ffmpeg is per se not a signed application, which could make
utilities like such suspect there
On 12 November 2017 at 06:37, Gyan Doshi wrote:
>
> On 11/12/2017 11:11 AM, Kevin Duffey wrote:
>
>> If other posts I found indicated that this was a normal speed I might
>> accept it... however, I see many posts indicating they get 100, 200 or more
>> fps when concat/demux is being used where I am
On 12 November 2017 at 05:41, Kevin Duffey
wrote:
> Incidentally, I send this and reply via email. Is there some way to not top
> post? A few of you responded last time with telling me not to top post, but I
> am not sure what that is and how to avoid it when using email replies.
> thank you.
On 11/12/2017 11:11 AM, Kevin Duffey wrote:
If other posts I found indicated that this was a normal speed I might accept
it... however, I see many posts indicating they get 100, 200 or more fps when
concat/demux is being used where I am getting about 5fps to 10fps.
Rather than fps, check th
Hi all,
Posted a thread on this a month or so back, still have not been able to make
any headway on why this process is so very slow on my system I am posting again
because I am in the process of building a threadripper system mostly for video
editing 4K DNxHR and eventually RAW footage, and of
21 matches
Mail list logo
