Carl Eugen writes:
> Sounds like a performance issue that has nothing to do
with mkv vs mov.
Do you mean my system specs? 1080p FFV1.mkv plays back with just a little
stuttering on a core i5 3570k in VLC, but FFV1.mov just doesn't display video
at all, I only get audio on any PC I've tried an
Kieran O'Leary irishfilm.ie> writes:
> > Please elaborate, this does not sound like a known
> > issue to me.
>
> It's more of an issue with VLC. It plays back SD ffv1.mov
> just fine, but it only plays back audio for HD content.
Sounds like a performance issue that has nothing to do
with mkv
Carl Eugen writes:
>Please elaborate, this does not sound like a known
issue to me.
It's more of an issue with VLC. It plays back SD ffv1.mov just fine, but it
only plays back audio for HD content. I've never had any issues with .mkv. I've
only ever used ffv1 with 10 bit content.
Anyhow this
Kieran O'Leary irishfilm.ie> writes:
> The reason that I wanted to use MKV was that FFV1
> doesn't work well for me in non SD resolutions in
> a .mov container.
Please elaborate, this does not sound like a known
issue to me.
Carl Eugen
___
ffmpeg-
Hi Carl,
As the file is a tape ingest, I was hoping to preserve the timecode if I could.
The reason that I wanted to use MKV was that FFV1 doesn't work well for me in
non SD resolutions in a .mov container. Keeping HD in v210.mov is just too
large a file.
Thanks,
Kieran.
--
This email h
Kieran O'Leary irishfilm.ie> writes:
> I have a 1080p24 v210.mov file with 2 audio tracks and a
> data track, which I'm assuming is the timecode. I want
> to just transcode the video track to ffv1, and copy over
> everything else into a matroska wrapper.
Why?
I mean it appears as if Matroska d
I have a 1080p24 v210.mov file with 2 audio tracks and a data track, which I'm
assuming is the timecode. I want to just transcode the video track to ffv1, and
copy over everything else into a matroska wrapper.
Is there an easier way to do this, and is it possible to carry over timecode to
matro
