On 7/25/2015 2:54 PM, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
Peter Rabbitson rabbit.us> writes:
I am hoping that ffmpeg can somehow help me with a
workaround.
You can try the input option "-r", unfortunately
it does not work for many use-cases.
FFmpeg is not very good with h264 timestamps...
who is?
ju
Peter Rabbitson rabbit.us> writes:
> > I have a Logitech C920 affected by a know-yet-wontfix kernel uvc-video
> > bug[1]. Given That I need a relatively recent kernel and it looks like
> > the problematic patch in 3.17+ will not be reverted, I am hoping that
> > ffmpeg can somehow help me with a
On 07/25/2015 01:50 AM, Peter Rabbitson wrote:
Hello!
I have a Logitech C920 affected by a know-yet-wontfix kernel uvc-video
bug[1]. Given That I need a relatively recent kernel and it looks like
the problematic patch in 3.17+ will not be reverted, I am hoping that
ffmpeg can somehow help me wit
On 07/25/2015 12:54 PM, Henk D. Schoneveld wrote:
On 25 Jul 2015, at 01:50, Peter Rabbitson wrote:
Hello!
I have a Logitech C920 affected by a know-yet-wontfix kernel uvc-video bug[1].
Given That I need a relatively recent kernel and it looks like the problematic
patch in 3.17+ will not be
Peter Rabbitson rabbit.us> writes:
> I am hoping that ffmpeg can somehow help me with a
> workaround.
You can try the input option "-r", unfortunately
it does not work for many use-cases.
FFmpeg is not very good with h264 timestamps...
Carl Eugen
On 25 Jul 2015, at 01:50, Peter Rabbitson wrote:
> Hello!
>
> I have a Logitech C920 affected by a know-yet-wontfix kernel uvc-video
> bug[1]. Given That I need a relatively recent kernel and it looks like the
> problematic patch in 3.17+ will not be reverted, I am hoping that ffmpeg can
> s
Hello!
I have a Logitech C920 affected by a know-yet-wontfix kernel uvc-video
bug[1]. Given That I need a relatively recent kernel and it looks like
the problematic patch in 3.17+ will not be reverted, I am hoping that
ffmpeg can somehow help me with a workaround.
The problem in short is tha