> I tried your way. Unfortunately it's not working.
> time ffmpeg -hwaccel vaapi -hwaccel_device /dev/dri/renderD128
> -hwaccel_output_format vaapi -i ../WK.0217/2024_0217_S0n000.mp4 -r 1 -i
> 2024_0217_S0n000-f%04d.tiff -filter_complex
> '[1:v]hwupload,format=vaapi[1v];[0:v][1v]overlay_vaapi' -r 7
Am 31.03.24 um 18:15 schrieb Hervé ANSELME:
In other words, re-encoding with the x265 codec for the final video : can it
improve the final video quality, compared to the source video, when the source
video is encoded with x264?
how should a lossy codec restore information dropped by the los
Hervé ANSELME (12024-03-31):
> I have a question about re-encoding a source video having libx264 video codec.
>
> Is there any advantage(s) to re-encode with the libx265, which is supposed to
> give better result than libx264 ?
>
> In other words, re-encoding with the x265 codec for the final vi
On Sun, 31 Mar 2024 at 19:15, Hervé ANSELME <
hervea95-at-hotmail@ffmpeg.org> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I have a question about re-encoding a source video having libx264 video
> codec.
>
> Is there any advantage(s) to re-encode with the libx265, which is supposed
> to give better result than libx26
Hi all,
I have a question about re-encoding a source video having libx264 video codec.
Is there any advantage(s) to re-encode with the libx265, which is supposed to
give better result than libx264 ?
In other words, re-encoding with the x265 codec for the final video : can it
improve the final
Hi all,
I have a question about re-encoding a source video having libx264 video codec.
Is there any advantage(s) to re-encode with the libx265, which is supposed to
give better result than libx264 ?
In other words, re-encoding with the x265 codec for the final video : can it
improve the final
