Re: [FFmpeg-user] Licensing ffmpeg

On 9/22/2019 9:27 PM, kushal ghosh wrote: Yes. I took a published build of ffmpeg and want to use commercially. I am not very specific in using any of the licensed or patented parts of ffmpeg. So basically I want to n=know what the thing to be done so that I can commercially use it. I believe onl

Re: [FFmpeg-user] Licensing ffmpeg

Yes. I took a published build of ffmpeg and want to use commercially. I am not very specific in using any of the licensed or patented parts of ffmpeg. So basically I want to n=know what the thing to be done so that I can commercially use it. I believe only LGPL part of it can be used freely? Thanks

Re: [FFmpeg-user] Unsync between Audio and Video and other Issues

On 9/22/2019 8:02 AM, Rudolf Schmidt wrote: So hope you guys will redesign it by time and make it multi thread supported, its amazing that in todays time with 16 threads and more ffmpeg still works single threaded. Given that AFAIK most of the people working on ffmpeg are not paid to do so, it

Re: [FFmpeg-user] Ffmpeg is a Windows codec?

Yes, I am all set. From what I have read installing IV5 gets you the others as well but as I say Windows comes with them all disabled. I don’t remember the last time I used them and I would not have too but I was playing with ”winevdm” which lets you run Windows 16-bit programs on 64-bit Windo

Re: [FFmpeg-user] Ffmpeg is a Windows codec?

> On Sep 20, 2019, at 1:08 PM, jamie marchant wrote: > >>> VFW works on windows 10? >> >> Yes, it does. >> However, FFmpeg does not install any system codecs. >> You could install IV50 that was delivered for free with the Intel Play >> microscope in ancient times and thus can still be found for

Re: [FFmpeg-user] Licensing ffmpeg

> On Sep 22, 2019, at 2:29 PM, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote: > > Am So., 22. Sept. 2019 um 20:24 Uhr schrieb kushal ghosh > : > >> I want to use ffmpeg.exe for a commercial purpose. Please update > > I assume you want to "distribute" ffmpeg.exe for commercial > purposes, if you want to "use" it, you

Re: [FFmpeg-user] Unsync between Audio and Video and other Issues

I am pretty sure being (actively or passively) aggressive will solve nothing for nobody in this discussion (on both sides). I am not a long-term user and still learn how to use ffmpeg, however I can add a few information to help to solve the problem. Your system cannot handle the throughput of you

Re: [FFmpeg-user] Licensing ffmpeg

Am So., 22. Sept. 2019 um 20:24 Uhr schrieb kushal ghosh : > I want to use ffmpeg.exe for a commercial purpose. Please update I assume you want to "distribute" ffmpeg.exe for commercial purposes, if you want to "use" it, you only have to agree to the no-warranty clause. > me with the steps so th

[FFmpeg-user] Licensing ffmpeg

Hello, I want to use ffmpeg.exe for a commercial purpose. Please update me with the steps so that I dont violate the licensing obligations. I went through the site but seemed a bit confusing. Do I need to build ffmpeg without -enable-gpl? Thanks ___ ffmpe

Re: [FFmpeg-user] Unsync between Audio and Video and other Issues

Am So., 22. Sept. 2019 um 17:02 Uhr schrieb Rudolf Schmidt : > I have spoken with some guys from the IRC #ffmpeg who encouraged me to > not use ffmpeg because its poor developed. I was surprised. Its sad to > hear coz ffmpeg is at command line, flexible and interesting, never > expected its "poor

Re: [FFmpeg-user] Unsync between Audio and Video and other Issues

Hi I have spoken with some guys from the IRC #ffmpeg who encouraged me to not use ffmpeg because its poor developed. I was surprised. Its sad to hear coz ffmpeg is at command line, flexible and interesting, never expected its "poor in design". So hope you guys will redesign it by time and make it

Re: [FFmpeg-user] Licensing fees

> Am 22.09.2019 um 13:09 schrieb Spencer Graves : > > The Wikipedia article on FFmpeg says, "License: LGPL 2.1+, GPL 2+ > Unredistributable if compiled with NVIDIA Performance Primitives." That > comment has a footnote saying, "FFmpeg can be configured to make it > proprietary and unred

Re: [FFmpeg-user] Licensing fees

> Am 22.09.2019 um 09:52 schrieb iBlocker iBlocker : > > In case a small company needs to include the ffmpeg into an application > which runs on Raspbian, and probably will commercialize the Pi3/Pi4 device, > I would like to know what will be the the "licensing fees" needed to be > paid. You ha

Re: [FFmpeg-user] Licensing fees

  The Wikipedia article on FFmpeg says, "License:  LGPL 2.1+, GPL 2+ Unredistributable if compiled with NVIDIA Performance Primitives." That comment has a footnote saying, "FFmpeg can be configured to make it proprietary and unredistributable software, because NVIDIA Performance Primitives,

[FFmpeg-user] Licensing fees

Hello, In case a small company needs to include the ffmpeg into an application which runs on Raspbian, and probably will commercialize the Pi3/Pi4 device, I would like to know what will be the the "licensing fees" needed to be paid. Thank you. Emil Radu _