The patch that caligula sent works. I tested it on the git from
yesterday and firefox is now able to read the jpg ffserver output
properly with that applied.
The only difference is that I added an enter on line 26 because it was
two lines into one. Can it be committed now?
diff -Nrup ffmpeg-
I changed it to git and add the .write header to the last part. The first part
compiled after I changed ffserver.c, so it is no longer corrupted. Muxer
detection seems to work when I tried it for the middle part. It should be good
to fix ffserver now?
diff -Nrup ffmpeg-git--orig/ffserver.c ffm
patch attached.
On Mon, May 04, 2015 at 06:35:36PM -0600, ill wrote:
I changed it to git and add the .write header to the last part. The first part
compiled after I changed ffserver.c, so it is no longer corrupted. Muxer
detection seems to work when I tried it for the middle part. It should
Can this patch be applied now? It doesn't have any line breaks anymore.
On Mon, May 04, 2015 at 06:35:36PM -0600, ill wrote:
I changed it to git and add the .write header to the last part. The first part
compiled after I changed ffserver.c, so it is no longer corrupted. Muxer
dete
File /tmp/cam.ffm #when remarked, no file is beeing created and
the stream keeps working!!
FileMaxSize 400K
# Only allow connections from localhost to the feed.
ACL allow 127.0.0.1
ACL allow 192.168.1.2 192.168.1.49
Feed cam.ffm
Format
When can the patch be applied?
On Mon, May 04, 2015 at 06:35:36PM -0600, ill wrote:
I changed it to git and add the .write header to the last part. The first part
compiled after I changed ffserver.c, so it is no longer corrupted. Muxer
detection seems to work when I tried it for the middle
Can the patch be applied now?
On Mon, May 04, 2015 at 06:35:36PM -0600, ill wrote:
I changed it to git and add the .write header to the last part. The first part
compiled after I changed ffserver.c, so it is no longer corrupted. Muxer
detection seems to work when I tried it for the middle
It applies for me.
Konsole output
$ patch -p1 I still haven't gotten a reply about the author. Can I just set the
author as anybody or does it have to be someone specific?
On Sun, May 10, 2015 at 07:20:02PM -0600, ill wrote:
Can the patch be applied now?
please provide a patch
That is what I sent. It is the same file. I have run the git
format-patch -1 on this as well, not that the command seems to do
anything to the patch file itself.
On Sun, 10 May 2015 22:31:27 -0600
ill wrote:
It applies for me.
Konsole output
$ patch -p1
You are supposed to send this
I attached the file made by Konsole output git commit -p and then the
format patch command.
I wrote that caligula person as the author because he was the one who
posted the modified code stuff that I used.
On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 05:02:34PM -0600, ill wrote:
That is what I sent. It is the
So it the patch good now? It has authors and everything.
On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 05:02:34PM -0600, ill wrote:
That is what I sent. It is the same file. I have run the git
format-patch -1 on this as well, not that the command seems to do
anything to the patch file itself.
you would have to
That file is attached
you would have to attach the file generated by git format-patch
also you of course first need to locally commit your changes
and set the commit message and author
see man git commit
[...]
___
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-de
That file is attached
you would have to attach the file generated by git format-patch
also you of course first need to locally commit your changes
and set the commit message and author
see man git commit
[...]
___
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-d
That file is attached
you would have to attach the file generated by git format-patch
also you of course first need to locally commit your changes
and set the commit message and author
see man git commit
[...]
___
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-
That file is attached
you would have to attach the file generated by git format-patch
also you of course first need to locally commit your changes
and set the commit message and author
see man git commit
[...]
___
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg
So can the ffserver patch be committed?
>From 5b681fdaf7971f841b84cfe06412c67ba417fb00 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Caligula useraccount
Date: Mon, 11 May 2015 17:42:42 -0600
Subject: [PATCH] ffserver jpg patch
---
ffserver.c | 4
ffserver_config.c| 6 --
The jpg output plugin is outputting a stream (with no mimetype) instead
of an image file, so browsers like firefox can't view it properly and
try to download it or try to grab the never ending stream instead of
just a single image.
There was a patch to fix this, but I don't think it was ever a
There was a patch to fix this, but I don't think it was ever applied:
http://lists.ffmpeg.org/pipermail/ffmpeg-devel/2006-June/013107.html
Did you test the patch?
Carl Eugen
No. I don't know if it works and don't really know how to apply it. It's
also a bit old.
_
So can this be applied to ffserver and put in the git?
Ave all
Background:
I'm using ffserver, which feeds of a webcam, to serve .swf and .jpg
files.
To serve the .jpg files, I use the patch mentioned in
http://lists.ffmpeg.org/pipermail/ffmpeg-devel/2006-June/013107.html
Over the years I
Who is in charge of committing the patches? This patch fixes bugs, so I
don't see why it should be ignored.
Ave all
Background:
I'm using ffserver, which feeds of a webcam, to serve .swf and .jpg
files.
To serve the .jpg files, I use the patch mentioned in
http://lists.ffmpeg.org/pipermail
20 matches
Mail list logo
