W dniu 2017-03-16 o 19:17, Michael Niedermayer pisze:
> On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 10:52:29PM +0100, Mateusz Brzostek wrote:
>> Hello!
>>
>> There are 3 problems with DITHER_COPY macro in libswscale/swscale_unscaled.c:
>> 1) there is overflow in dithering from 12-
In previous patch there was missing braces {} in for (; j < length; j++) loop.
Please ignore that patch.
New patch with braces and without FFMIN macro.
Mateusz
W dniu 2017-03-18 o 21:28, Mateusz Brzostek pisze:
> W dniu 2017-03-16 o 19:17, Michael Niedermayer pisze:
>> On Wed, Mar
W dniu 2017-03-20 o 10:00, Carl Eugen Hoyos pisze:
> 2017-03-15 22:52 GMT+01:00 Mateusz Brzostek :
>> Hello!
>>
>> There are 3 problems with DITHER_COPY macro in libswscale/swscale_unscaled.c:
>> 1) there is overflow in dithering from 12-bit to 10-bit (output value &
Hello!
There are 3 problems with DITHER_COPY macro in libswscale/swscale_unscaled.c:
1) there is overflow in dithering from 12-bit to 10-bit (output value > 1023);
2) for limit range the lower limit is not respected, for example from 10-bit to
8-bit value 64 is converted to 15;
3) for many iterat
W dniu 2017-03-16 o 19:17, Michael Niedermayer pisze:
> On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 10:52:29PM +0100, Mateusz Brzostek wrote:
>> Hello!
>>
>> There are 3 problems with DITHER_COPY macro in libswscale/swscale_unscaled.c:
>> 1) there is overflow in dithering from 12-
