-Original Message-
From: ffmpeg-devel On Behalf Of Michael
Niedermayer
Sent: Monday, July 28, 2025 5:16 PM
To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches
Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] avcodec/apv: align APV color format
support with latest liboapv version
>On Wed, Jul 23, 2025 at 0
Michael Niedermayer (HE12025-07-29):
> regression fix for this is here:
> https://code.ffmpeg.org/FFmpeg/FFmpeg/pulls/20055
I see no commit message.
I see removing opening braces without removing them.
(see attached screenshot; maybe it looks better for others)
As is: rejected and revert the pr
On Mon, 28 Jul 2025 16:18:29 +0200 Nicolas George wrote:
> Niklas Haas (HE12025-07-24):
> > On what component are you missing an error here?
>
> Recently I wrote: “stacking images with different kind of alpha or
> sending this kind of frames to a muxer with uncoded frames”
>
> So: at least filters
On 29/07/2025 00:13, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> Hi
>
> with git send email i can send 5 independant patches with
>
> git send-email --to='FFmpeg development discussions and patches
> ' -5
>
> and have some CC: tags to make sure people
> (like bug reporter or security researcher) get notifie
On Mon, Jul 28, 2025 at 08:14:58PM -0300, James Almer wrote:
> On 7/28/2025 8:13 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > with git send email i can send 5 independant patches with
> >
> > git send-email --to='FFmpeg development discussions and patches
> > ' -5
> >
> > and have some CC: t
On 7/29/2025 2:51 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
On Mon, Jul 28, 2025 at 08:14:58PM -0300, James Almer wrote:
On 7/28/2025 8:13 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
Hi
with git send email i can send 5 independant patches with
git send-email --to='FFmpeg development discussions and patches
' -5
On Mon, Jul 28, 2025 at 10:07 PM Stefano Sabatini wrote:
>
> Hi, sorry for the slow reply.
>
> On date Tuesday 2025-06-10 17:02:05 +0200, ffmpeg-devel Mailing List wrote:
> > From: Maryla Ustarroz-Calonge
> > Subject: [PATCH] ffprobe: add -codec: option
> > Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2025 17:02:05 +0200
>
Hi Nicolas!
Am 29. Juli 2025 10:55:15 MESZ schrieb Nicolas George :
>Michael Niedermayer (HE12025-07-29):
>> regression fix for this is here:
>> https://code.ffmpeg.org/FFmpeg/FFmpeg/pulls/20055
>
>I see no commit message.
>
>I see removing opening braces without removing them.
>
>(see attached sc
On Thu, 24 Jul 2025, Marton Balint wrote:
There is no benefit in delaying processing all available frames.
Will apply the series.
Regards,
Marton
Signed-off-by: Marton Balint
---
libavfilter/trim.c | 42 +-
1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 25 del
Hello,
It seem there is strong evidence that AI wrote TLS code as part of the
WHIP patch. It goes without saying why this is bad. Further discussion
here:
https://code.ffmpeg.org/FFmpeg/FFmpeg/pulls/20053
This patch was pushed without ML review.
I think this code should be removed before the FFm
Alexander Strasser via ffmpeg-devel (HE12025-07-29):
> You are looking at the overview with latest events for that PR.
>
> To see the the individual commits select
> that view at the top. Or if you want to see
> the combined diff, click on changes one
> further to the right.
This thing is looking
Consider the following sequence of NALUs (with some PPSs etc. omitted
for brevity):
1. SPS (ID=0, content=A)
2. IDR (SPS=0)
3. IDR (SPS=0)
4. SPS (ID=0, content=B)
5. TRAIL (SPS=0)
When decode_sps is called for NALU 3., ps->sps_id_used is cleared as
IDRs are one way of forming a CLVSS. Then, old_
On 28/07/2025 15:20, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> Hi
>
> regression: issue aaddresses a regression
> bug:something is not working
>
> This is inconsistent
> Label X cannot sometimes mean "X is removed" and "X is added"
>
> bug seems meaning that the PR adds a bug
> regression seems meani
> On Jul 30, 2025, at 04:02, Kieran Kunhya via ffmpeg-devel
> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> It seem there is strong evidence that AI wrote TLS code as part of the
> WHIP patch. It goes without saying why this is bad. Further discussion
> here:
> https://code.ffmpeg.org/FFmpeg/FFmpeg/pulls/20053
Hello
On Tue, 29 Jul 2025 at 22:59, Nicolas George wrote:
>
> Alexander Strasser via ffmpeg-devel (HE12025-07-29):
> > You are looking at the overview with latest events for that PR.
> >
> > To see the the individual commits select
> > that view at the top. Or if you want to see
> > the combined diff, c
Kacper Michajlow (HE12025-07-29):
> https://code.ffmpeg.org/FFmpeg/FFmpeg/pulls/20055.patch
You forgot to do a copy-paste.
--
Nicolas George
___
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
To un
Hi all,
As with last year, Michael asked me to help coordinate the creation of
grant request to the STF:
https://trac.ffmpeg.org/wiki/SponsoringPrograms/STF/2025
The objective remains to unlock funds for individuals that are
interested in contributing to the FFMPEG codebase.
The proposed deadli
Signed-off-by: Sanjay Jangid
---
libavfilter/vf_drawtext.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/libavfilter/vf_drawtext.c b/libavfilter/vf_drawtext.c
index aae703b..5cd8633 100644
--- a/libavfilter/vf_drawtext.c
+++ b/libavfilter/vf_drawtext.c
@@ -1880,7 +1880,7 @@ st
This fix copies a couple of casts from surrounding functions.
See https://crbug.com/432528781 for stack trace details.
Signed-off-by: Dale Curtis
flac_fix_v1.patch
Description: Binary data
___
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
https://
On 7/29/2025 5:56 PM, Kacper Michajlow wrote:
On Tue, 29 Jul 2025 at 22:11, James Almer wrote:
On 7/29/2025 5:02 PM, Kieran Kunhya via ffmpeg-devel wrote:
Hello,
It seem there is strong evidence that AI wrote TLS code as part of the
WHIP patch. It goes without saying why this is bad. Further
On Tue, Jul 29, 2025 at 10:04:51PM +0100, Frank Plowman wrote:
> On 28/07/2025 15:20, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > regression: issue aaddresses a regression
> > bug:something is not working
> >
> > This is inconsistent
> > Label X cannot sometimes mean "X is removed" and "X i
On Tue, Jul 29, 2025 at 11:40 PM Michael Niedermayer
wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jul 29, 2025 at 10:04:51PM +0100, Frank Plowman wrote:
> > On 28/07/2025 15:20, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> > > Hi
> > >
> > > regression: issue aaddresses a regression
> > > bug:something is not working
> > >
> > > T
On Tue, Jul 29, 2025 at 11:09:52AM +0200, d.frankie...@samsung.com wrote:
> -Original Message-
> From: ffmpeg-devel On Behalf Of Michael
> Niedermayer
> Sent: Monday, July 28, 2025 5:16 PM
> To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches
> Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] avcodec/apv:
Cai Fan 于2025年7月30日 周三11:43写道：
> Signed-off-by: Cai Fan
> ---
> libavformat/img2enc.c | 5 +
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/libavformat/img2enc.c b/libavformat/img2enc.c
> index 41638d92b8..f7d983ec54 100644
> --- a/libavformat/img2enc.c
> +++ b/libavformat/img2enc.c
> @@
On 29/07/2025 02:37, Timo Rothenpieler wrote:
On 7/28/2025 7:24 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
On Mon, Jul 28, 2025 at 06:15:53PM +0200, Timo Rothenpieler wrote:
On 7/28/2025 4:40 PM, Diederick C. Niehorster wrote:
On Mon, Jul 28, 2025 at 4:21 PM Michael Niedermayer
wrote:
Hi
regression: i
Cai Fan 于2025年7月29日周二 10:23写道：
>
> Signed-off-by: Cai Fan
> ---
> libavformat/img2enc.c | 3 ++-
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/libavformat/img2enc.c b/libavformat/img2enc.c
> index 672cfe18fd..f7d983ec54 100644
> --- a/libavformat/img2enc.c
> +++ b/libavformat
On 7/29/2025 5:02 PM, Kieran Kunhya via ffmpeg-devel wrote:
Hello,
It seem there is strong evidence that AI wrote TLS code as part of the
WHIP patch. It goes without saying why this is bad. Further discussion
here:
https://code.ffmpeg.org/FFmpeg/FFmpeg/pulls/20053
This patch was pushed without
On 7/30/2025 12:39 AM, James Almer wrote:
On 7/29/2025 5:56 PM, Kacper Michajlow wrote:
On Tue, 29 Jul 2025 at 22:11, James Almer wrote:
On 7/29/2025 5:02 PM, Kieran Kunhya via ffmpeg-devel wrote:
Hello,
It seem there is strong evidence that AI wrote TLS code as part of the
WHIP patch. It
On Tue, 29 Jul 2025 at 22:11, James Almer wrote:
>
> On 7/29/2025 5:02 PM, Kieran Kunhya via ffmpeg-devel wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > It seem there is strong evidence that AI wrote TLS code as part of the
> > WHIP patch. It goes without saying why this is bad. Further discussion
> > here:
> > https:
Hi all,
Are there any recommendations on how to best get attention to some
patches/changes?
With the introduction of the new forgejo workflow (which I personally
welcome!), I am wondering how casual contributors like myself should
approach the task of finding reviewers.
So far, I am aware of the
On Sat, Jun 21, 2025 at 11:15:21PM +0200, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> Fixes: heap-buffer-overflow
> Fixes:
> 418421333/clusterfuzz-testcase-minimized-ffmpeg_AV_CODEC_ID_APV_fuzzer-6592025183191040
> Fixes:
> 418804929/clusterfuzz-testcase-minimized-ffmpeg_BSF_APV_METADATA_fuzzer-5773904646045696
Romain Beauxis (HE12025-07-29):
> Are there any recommendations on how to best get attention to some
> patches/changes?
Speaking for myself, I will not lift a finger to adapt to this thing
until the dust is settles and the promises that were made about a full
ability to interact by mail and comman
Signed-off-by: Sanjay Jangid
---
libavfilter/vf_drawtext.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/libavfilter/vf_drawtext.c b/libavfilter/vf_drawtext.c
index aae703b..5cd8633 100644
--- a/libavfilter/vf_drawtext.c
+++ b/libavfilter/vf_drawtext.c
@@ -1880,7 +1880,7 @@ st
Signed-off-by: Cai Fan
---
libavformat/img2enc.c | 5 +
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
diff --git a/libavformat/img2enc.c b/libavformat/img2enc.c
index 41638d92b8..f7d983ec54 100644
--- a/libavformat/img2enc.c
+++ b/libavformat/img2enc.c
@@ -180,6 +180,11 @@ static int write_packet(AVFormat
I'm not seeing a code change, just indenting the same line. Mistake?
___
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with su
35 matches
Mail list logo
