Re: [FFmpeg-devel] some thoughts on the website and warnings

2015-09-22 Thread Ganesh Ajjanagadde
On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 4:03 PM, wm4 wrote: > On Tue, 22 Sep 2015 15:35:06 -0400 > Calvin Walton wrote: > >> Please never enable "-Werror" by default in a release version of a >> package - where that's defined as whatever version you recommend >> arbitrary users pick up. > > +1, and please not fo

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] some thoughts on the website and warnings

2015-09-22 Thread Ganesh Ajjanagadde
On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 3:56 PM, Ronald S. Bultje wrote: > Hi Calvin, > > On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 9:35 PM, Calvin Walton > wrote: > >> On Sat, 2015-09-19 at 12:36 -0400, Ganesh Ajjanagadde wrote: >> > Regarding the large array of platforms, as can be seen from the >> > patches I have submitted ov

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] some thoughts on the website and warnings

2015-09-22 Thread wm4
On Tue, 22 Sep 2015 15:35:06 -0400 Calvin Walton wrote: > Please never enable "-Werror" by default in a release version of a > package - where that's defined as whatever version you recommend > arbitrary users pick up. +1, and please not for development versions either. _

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] some thoughts on the website and warnings

2015-09-22 Thread Ronald S. Bultje
Hi Calvin, On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 9:35 PM, Calvin Walton wrote: > On Sat, 2015-09-19 at 12:36 -0400, Ganesh Ajjanagadde wrote: > > Regarding the large array of platforms, as can be seen from the > > patches I have submitted over the past few weeks, one long term goal > > I > > have is getting t

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] some thoughts on the website and warnings

2015-09-22 Thread Calvin Walton
On Sat, 2015-09-19 at 12:36 -0400, Ganesh Ajjanagadde wrote: > Regarding the large array of platforms, as can be seen from the > patches I have submitted over the past few weeks, one long term goal > I > have is getting to a "nearly -Werror" state at least on the most > recent clang/gcc. Already no

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] some thoughts on the website and warnings

2015-09-19 Thread Lou Logan
On Sat, Sep 19, 2015, at 08:36 AM, Ganesh Ajjanagadde wrote: > Thus, FFmpeg can rightfully be proud of this accomplishment, and IMHO > should mention it publicly on the page. I can help/submit patches > regarding wording if others agree with this. The index page mentions "cross-platform", but if