On Sat, Oct 31, 2015 at 1:01 AM, Rostislav Pehlivanov
wrote:
> I agree with the others. There's quite a lot of noise on the ML and having
> some of
> your trivial patches (e.g. replacing functions with FFmpeg defined ones)
> merged into
> one would help to decrease it.
Could be, but please then a
I agree with the others. There's quite a lot of noise on the ML and having
some of
your trivial patches (e.g. replacing functions with FFmpeg defined ones)
merged into
one would help to decrease it.
>Currently I am trying to get rid of a
>lot of the last aspect to create a foundation for myself to
Hi,
On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 11:35 AM, Ganesh Ajjanagadde
wrote:
> Most, and perhaps all of them boil down to misunderstanding. This will
> hopefully improve over time. I apologize to all who did not like
> recent pushes from me. In fact, I can freely let go of my commit
> access if these were de
On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 8:42 AM, Paul B Mahol wrote:
> On 10/30/15, Ganesh Ajjanagadde wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Apologies for the length of the email, but there is a lot of stuff I
>> would like to cover due to my absence on IRC or other venues for "non
>> patch related" discussion.
>>
>> There ha
On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 10:07 AM, Nicolas George wrote:
> Hi.
>
> I am not on IRC either, so I can not comment on what happen there. I hope I
> have not shown myself what you consider hostility on this list. I will try
> to explain what I think may irritate people in your actions on this list.
>
>
On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 01:42:30PM +0100, Paul B Mahol wrote:
> On 10/30/15, Ganesh Ajjanagadde wrote:
[...]
> > e) I have no personal interest in asm optimizations (to address a
> > suggestion on IRC). I do appreciate the hard work there, it just does
> > not appeal to me for reasons that I can a
Hi.
I am not on IRC either, so I can not comment on what happen there. I hope I
have not shown myself what you consider hostility on this list. I will try
to explain what I think may irritate people in your actions on this list.
I will not comment on the issue of pushing without having addressed
On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 07:34:29AM -0400, Ganesh Ajjanagadde wrote:
[...]
TL;DR
Reviews are not meant to encourage, reviews are meant to find problems. A
good review is a review where problems are found and pointed out.
Sometimes, reviews mean suggesting way to find issues (which is then
generall
Hi,
I'll chime in on a few points.
On 10/30/2015 11:34 AM, Ganesh Ajjanagadde wrote:
> 1. "Sloppy" patches - I tend to give more verbose commit messages to
> explain rationale than many here. I also outlined why I did not post
> benchmarks initially. I myself still think they are unnecessary and
On 10/30/15, Ganesh Ajjanagadde wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Apologies for the length of the email, but there is a lot of stuff I
> would like to cover due to my absence on IRC or other venues for "non
> patch related" discussion.
>
> There has been a lot said and still being said regarding some patches
>
10 matches
Mail list logo
