On Sat, Sep 26, 2015 at 12:00 PM, Henrik Gramner wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 26, 2015 at 5:18 PM, Ganesh Ajjanagadde wrote:
>> On Sat, Sep 26, 2015 at 11:09 AM, Hendrik Leppkes
>> wrote:
>>> Please ping the actual thread of the patch, and not some seemingly
>>> unrelated thread, so people are actually
On Sat, Sep 26, 2015 at 5:18 PM, Ganesh Ajjanagadde wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 26, 2015 at 11:09 AM, Hendrik Leppkes wrote:
>> Please ping the actual thread of the patch, and not some seemingly
>> unrelated thread, so people are actually aware of the topic at hand.
>
> Apologies, but since the thread w
On Sat, Sep 26, 2015 at 11:09 AM, Hendrik Leppkes wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 26, 2015 at 5:03 PM, Ganesh Ajjanagadde wrote:
>> On Sat, Sep 19, 2015 at 9:03 AM, Ganesh Ajjanagadde wrote:
>>> On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 8:29 PM, Michael Niedermayer
>>> wrote:
On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 04:54:19PM +0200,
On Sat, Sep 26, 2015 at 5:03 PM, Ganesh Ajjanagadde wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 19, 2015 at 9:03 AM, Ganesh Ajjanagadde wrote:
>> On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 8:29 PM, Michael Niedermayer
>> wrote:
>>> On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 04:54:19PM +0200, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 08:48:3
On Sat, Sep 19, 2015 at 9:03 AM, Ganesh Ajjanagadde wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 8:29 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
>> On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 04:54:19PM +0200, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
>>> On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 08:48:33AM -0400, Ganesh Ajjanagadde wrote:
>>> > On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 6:
On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 8:29 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 04:54:19PM +0200, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
>> On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 08:48:33AM -0400, Ganesh Ajjanagadde wrote:
>> > On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 6:54 AM, Ronald S. Bultje
>> > wrote:
>> > > Hi Ganesh,
>> > >
>>
On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 04:54:19PM +0200, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 08:48:33AM -0400, Ganesh Ajjanagadde wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 6:54 AM, Ronald S. Bultje
> > wrote:
> > > Hi Ganesh,
> > >
> > > On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 10:27 PM, Ganesh Ajjanagadde
> > > wrot
On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 11:10 AM, Nicolas George wrote:
> Le nonidi 29 fructidor, an CCXXIII, Clement Boesch a écrit :
>> I don't like FFABSDIFF() patch because it creates a macro very much type
>> specific, while all other FF macro around are type agnostic.
>
> I agree, and I stick to the advice
On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 11:08 AM, Nicolas George wrote:
> Le nonidi 29 fructidor, an CCXXIII, Ronald S. Bultje a écrit :
>> The shell wouldn't know the difference. It has to be an atexit() mechanism
>> in the application cleaning up after itself. This isn't specific to the
>> shell state changing
Le nonidi 29 fructidor, an CCXXIII, Clement Boesch a écrit :
> I don't like FFABSDIFF() patch because it creates a macro very much type
> specific, while all other FF macro around are type agnostic.
I agree, and I stick to the advice I already posted: define the macro
locally when needed.
Regards
Le nonidi 29 fructidor, an CCXXIII, Ronald S. Bultje a écrit :
> The shell wouldn't know the difference. It has to be an atexit() mechanism
> in the application cleaning up after itself. This isn't specific to the
> shell state changing - it applies more generally imo.
There is no atexit() when a
On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 6:36 PM, Ronald S. Bultje wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 6:05 PM, Michael Niedermayer
> wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 05:35:53PM -0400, Ganesh Ajjanagadde wrote:
>> > On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 3:03 PM, Michael Niedermayer
>> wrote:
>> > > On Tue, Sep 15, 201
Hi,
On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 6:05 PM, Michael Niedermayer
wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 05:35:53PM -0400, Ganesh Ajjanagadde wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 3:03 PM, Michael Niedermayer
> wrote:
> > > On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 02:00:27PM -0400, Ganesh Ajjanagadde wrote:
> > >> On Tue, Sep 15
On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 05:35:53PM -0400, Ganesh Ajjanagadde wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 3:03 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 02:00:27PM -0400, Ganesh Ajjanagadde wrote:
> >> On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 1:47 PM, Michael Niedermayer
> >> wrote:
> >> > On Tue, Sep 15, 2
On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 3:03 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 02:00:27PM -0400, Ganesh Ajjanagadde wrote:
>> On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 1:47 PM, Michael Niedermayer
>> wrote:
>> > On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 12:47:35PM -0400, Ganesh Ajjanagadde wrote:
>> >> On Tue, Sep 15, 2015
On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 02:00:27PM -0400, Ganesh Ajjanagadde wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 1:47 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 12:47:35PM -0400, Ganesh Ajjanagadde wrote:
> >> On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 10:54 AM, Michael Niedermayer
> >> wrote:
> >> > On Tue, Sep 15,
On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 1:47 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 12:47:35PM -0400, Ganesh Ajjanagadde wrote:
>> On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 10:54 AM, Michael Niedermayer
>> wrote:
>> > On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 08:48:33AM -0400, Ganesh Ajjanagadde wrote:
>> >> On Tue, Sep 15, 2015
On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 12:47:35PM -0400, Ganesh Ajjanagadde wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 10:54 AM, Michael Niedermayer
> wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 08:48:33AM -0400, Ganesh Ajjanagadde wrote:
> >> On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 6:54 AM, Ronald S. Bultje
> >> wrote:
> >> > Hi Ganesh,
> >>
On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 10:54 AM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 08:48:33AM -0400, Ganesh Ajjanagadde wrote:
>> On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 6:54 AM, Ronald S. Bultje wrote:
>> > Hi Ganesh,
>> >
>> > On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 10:27 PM, Ganesh Ajjanagadde
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> >> Hi
On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 08:48:33AM -0400, Ganesh Ajjanagadde wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 6:54 AM, Ronald S. Bultje wrote:
> > Hi Ganesh,
> >
> > On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 10:27 PM, Ganesh Ajjanagadde
> > wrote:
> >
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> What is ffmpeg's policy on "necro-bumping" old patches?
On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 6:54 AM, Ronald S. Bultje wrote:
> Hi Ganesh,
>
> On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 10:27 PM, Ganesh Ajjanagadde
> wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> What is ffmpeg's policy on "necro-bumping" old patches? Or more
>> precisely, what is the policy of requesting a patch to be merged where
>> a
On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 8:18 AM, Clément Bœsch wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 10:27:30PM -0400, Ganesh Ajjanagadde wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> What is ffmpeg's policy on "necro-bumping" old patches? Or more
>> precisely, what is the policy of requesting a patch to be merged where
>> all objections r
On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 10:27:30PM -0400, Ganesh Ajjanagadde wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> What is ffmpeg's policy on "necro-bumping" old patches? Or more
> precisely, what is the policy of requesting a patch to be merged where
> all objections raised have been addressed via discussion/updated
> patches, a
Hi Ganesh,
On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 10:27 PM, Ganesh Ajjanagadde
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> What is ffmpeg's policy on "necro-bumping" old patches? Or more
> precisely, what is the policy of requesting a patch to be merged where
> all objections raised have been addressed via discussion/updated
> patch
24 matches
Mail list logo
