On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 12:10:40PM +0100, Mats Peterson wrote:
> On 03/16/2016 12:09 PM, Mats Peterson wrote:
> >On 03/16/2016 11:46 AM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> >>On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 10:06:56AM +0100, Mats Peterson wrote:
> >>>Moritz Barsnick skrev: (16 mars 2016 09:59:00 CET)
> On We
On 03/16/2016 12:32 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 12:10:40PM +0100, Mats Peterson wrote:
On 03/16/2016 12:09 PM, Mats Peterson wrote:
On 03/16/2016 11:46 AM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 10:06:56AM +0100, Mats Peterson wrote:
Moritz Barsnick skr
On 03/16/2016 12:09 PM, Mats Peterson wrote:
On 03/16/2016 11:46 AM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 10:06:56AM +0100, Mats Peterson wrote:
Moritz Barsnick skrev: (16 mars 2016 09:59:00 CET)
On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 09:17:55 +0100, Mats Peterson wrote:
Why are always
On 03/16/2016 11:46 AM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 10:06:56AM +0100, Mats Peterson wrote:
Moritz Barsnick skrev: (16 mars 2016 09:59:00 CET)
On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 09:17:55 +0100, Mats Peterson wrote:
Why are always 10+ mails quoted, when none of the context is
On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 10:06:56AM +0100, Mats Peterson wrote:
> Moritz Barsnick skrev: (16 mars 2016 09:59:00 CET)
> >On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 09:17:55 +0100, Mats Peterson wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >
> >Why are always 10+ mails quoted, when none of t
Moritz Barsnick skrev: (16 mars 2016 09:59:00 CET)
>On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 09:17:55 +0100, Mats Peterson wrote:
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>
>Why are always 10+ mails quoted, when none of the context is of
>interest? I'm tired of skipping all this stuff... I must find
On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 09:17:55 +0100, Mats Peterson wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
Why are always 10+ mails quoted, when none of the context is of
interest? I'm tired of skipping all this stuff... I must find that mutt
patch again. (Mats, this isn't personally directe
On 03/16/2016 09:17 AM, Mats Peterson wrote:
On 03/16/2016 09:12 AM, Hendrik Leppkes wrote:
On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 9:07 AM, Mats Peterson
wrote:
On 03/16/2016 09:07 AM, Hendrik Leppkes wrote:
On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 9:03 AM, Mats Peterson
wrote:
On 03/16/2016 09:04 AM, Hendrik Leppkes wr
On 03/16/2016 09:12 AM, Hendrik Leppkes wrote:
On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 9:07 AM, Mats Peterson
wrote:
On 03/16/2016 09:07 AM, Hendrik Leppkes wrote:
On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 9:03 AM, Mats Peterson
wrote:
On 03/16/2016 09:04 AM, Hendrik Leppkes wrote:
On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 8:59 AM, Mats
On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 9:07 AM, Mats Peterson
wrote:
> On 03/16/2016 09:07 AM, Hendrik Leppkes wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 9:03 AM, Mats Peterson
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 03/16/2016 09:04 AM, Hendrik Leppkes wrote:
On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 8:59 AM, Mats Peterson
wrote:
>
On 03/16/2016 09:10 AM, Mats Peterson wrote:
On 03/16/2016 09:07 AM, Mats Peterson wrote:
On 03/16/2016 09:07 AM, Hendrik Leppkes wrote:
On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 9:03 AM, Mats Peterson
wrote:
On 03/16/2016 09:04 AM, Hendrik Leppkes wrote:
On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 8:59 AM, Mats Peterson
wrote
On 03/16/2016 09:07 AM, Mats Peterson wrote:
On 03/16/2016 09:07 AM, Hendrik Leppkes wrote:
On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 9:03 AM, Mats Peterson
wrote:
On 03/16/2016 09:04 AM, Hendrik Leppkes wrote:
On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 8:59 AM, Mats Peterson
wrote:
On 03/16/2016 08:55 AM, Hendrik Leppkes wr
On 03/16/2016 09:07 AM, Hendrik Leppkes wrote:
On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 9:03 AM, Mats Peterson
wrote:
On 03/16/2016 09:04 AM, Hendrik Leppkes wrote:
On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 8:59 AM, Mats Peterson
wrote:
On 03/16/2016 08:55 AM, Hendrik Leppkes wrote:
On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 7:50 AM, Mats
On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 9:03 AM, Mats Peterson
wrote:
> On 03/16/2016 09:04 AM, Hendrik Leppkes wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 8:59 AM, Mats Peterson
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 03/16/2016 08:55 AM, Hendrik Leppkes wrote:
On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 7:50 AM, Mats Peterson
wrote:
>
On 03/16/2016 09:04 AM, Hendrik Leppkes wrote:
On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 8:59 AM, Mats Peterson
wrote:
On 03/16/2016 08:55 AM, Hendrik Leppkes wrote:
On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 7:50 AM, Mats Peterson
wrote:
On 03/16/2016 04:48 AM, Mats Peterson wrote:
On 03/16/2016 04:45 AM, Mats Peterson wr
On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 8:59 AM, Mats Peterson
wrote:
> On 03/16/2016 08:55 AM, Hendrik Leppkes wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 7:50 AM, Mats Peterson
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 03/16/2016 04:48 AM, Mats Peterson wrote:
On 03/16/2016 04:45 AM, Mats Peterson wrote:
>
>
>
On 03/16/2016 08:55 AM, Hendrik Leppkes wrote:
On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 7:50 AM, Mats Peterson
wrote:
On 03/16/2016 04:48 AM, Mats Peterson wrote:
On 03/16/2016 04:45 AM, Mats Peterson wrote:
You say the libav commits are merged every day. This commit was posted
February 22, that's quite a w
On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 7:50 AM, Mats Peterson
wrote:
> On 03/16/2016 04:48 AM, Mats Peterson wrote:
>>
>> On 03/16/2016 04:45 AM, Mats Peterson wrote:
>>>
>>> You say the libav commits are merged every day. This commit was posted
>>> February 22, that's quite a while ago. What is it that causes t
On 03/16/2016 04:48 AM, Mats Peterson wrote:
On 03/16/2016 04:45 AM, Mats Peterson wrote:
You say the libav commits are merged every day. This commit was posted
February 22, that's quite a while ago. What is it that causes this delay?
Mats
This is a super-simple patch, at that.
Mats
Onc
On 03/16/2016 04:45 AM, Mats Peterson wrote:
You say the libav commits are merged every day. This commit was posted
February 22, that's quite a while ago. What is it that causes this delay?
Mats
This is a super-simple patch, at that.
Mats
--
Mats Peterson
http://matsp888.no-ip.org/~mats/
_
20 matches
Mail list logo