Re: [FFmpeg-devel] coverity testing of FFmpeg

2016-11-27 Thread Philip Langdale
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iEYEARECAAYFAlg7ZnwACgkQ+NaxlGp1aC7rHQCfeMtiAL4kPwIFd37da56aFtVY eiEAn3Vh0A63CcNSu6MuGVuo8p5U/CJw =eJcJ -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@f

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] coverity testing of FFmpeg

2016-11-27 Thread Timo Rothenpieler
> 3. Proprietary dependencies, which may or may not currently be an issue > anymore. Philip and Timo, how easy is it to get cuda/nvenc/cuvid/npp to > compile. > cuda/cuvid/nvenc don't need any external dependencies to compile, only to run. libnpp needs proprietary and non-redistributable headers

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] coverity testing of FFmpeg

2016-11-27 Thread Timothy Gu
On Sun, Nov 27, 2016 at 1:52 PM Michael Niedermayer wrote: > I dont want to give a automated travis_ci system any write or admin > access, some of what i read hinted in that direction, some of what > i read hinted that this was not needed though > giving a automated system write access would be a

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] coverity testing of FFmpeg

2016-11-27 Thread Timothy Gu
On Sun, Nov 27, 2016 at 1:13 PM Philip Langdale wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On Sun, 27 Nov 2016 21:26:13 +0100 > Michael Niedermayer wrote: > > > On Sun, Nov 27, 2016 at 11:00:21AM -0800, Philip Langdale wrote: > > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > > > Hash:

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] coverity testing of FFmpeg

2016-11-27 Thread Michael Niedermayer
On Sun, Nov 27, 2016 at 11:00:21AM -0800, Philip Langdale wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On Sat, 26 Nov 2016 23:55:17 +0100 > Michael Niedermayer wrote: > > > Hi all > > > > The machine on which the coverity stuff is is old, both hw and OS. > > the OS will no longe

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] coverity testing of FFmpeg

2016-11-27 Thread Philip Langdale
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Sun, 27 Nov 2016 21:26:13 +0100 Michael Niedermayer wrote: > On Sun, Nov 27, 2016 at 11:00:21AM -0800, Philip Langdale wrote: > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > > Hash: SHA1 > > > > On Sat, 26 Nov 2016 23:55:17 +0100 > > Michael Niedermayer

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] coverity testing of FFmpeg

2016-11-27 Thread Josh de Kock
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 2016/11/27 19:00, Philip Langdale wrote: > On Sat, 26 Nov 2016 23:55:17 +0100 Michael Niedermayer > wrote: > >> Hi all > >> The machine on which the coverity stuff is is old, both hw and >> OS. the OS will no longer get security updates in a fe

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] coverity testing of FFmpeg

2016-11-27 Thread Michael Niedermayer
On Sun, Nov 27, 2016 at 11:00:21AM -0800, Philip Langdale wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On Sat, 26 Nov 2016 23:55:17 +0100 > Michael Niedermayer wrote: > > > Hi all > > > > The machine on which the coverity stuff is is old, both hw and OS. > > the OS will no longe

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] coverity testing of FFmpeg

2016-11-27 Thread Philip Langdale
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Sat, 26 Nov 2016 23:55:17 +0100 Michael Niedermayer wrote: > Hi all > > The machine on which the coverity stuff is is old, both hw and OS. > the OS will no longer get security updates in a few months and the hw > does not always boot and its swit