2018-04-14 11:31 GMT+02:00 Martin Vignali :
>
> >
>> > For the proxy chroma version is also the same matrix use in prores_aw
>>
>> Patch is OK then, assumming FATE still passes.
>>
>>
>> Ok thanks for comments.
> It passes fate test for me (but prores_ks have few fate test !)
>
> I will wait few d
> >
> > For the proxy chroma version is also the same matrix use in prores_aw
>
> Patch is OK then, assumming FATE still passes.
>
>
> Ok thanks for comments.
It passes fate test for me (but prores_ks have few fate test !)
I will wait few days, if someone else have comments, before apply.
Martin
On 4/13/18, Martin Vignali wrote:
>> You sure those are actually used in binary?
>>
>>
> luma, chroma matrix in prores is write in each frame.
> So i take these values, from a real sample (prores made with official
> encoder (and for xq, you can also, compare with arri sample footage)
>
> For the
> You sure those are actually used in binary?
>
>
luma, chroma matrix in prores is write in each frame.
So i take these values, from a real sample (prores made with official
encoder (and for xq, you can also, compare with arri sample footage)
For the proxy chroma version is also the same matrix us
On 4/13/18, Martin Vignali wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Patch in attach, add support to a separate luma and chroma matrix
> for prores encoding
>
> like proxy and xq codec version, doesn't have the same luma and chroma
> matrix
>
> The official xq luma matrix is not use for now (need to fix something
> els
