rds,Jesse
>> From: reimar.doeffin...@gmx.de
>> Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2014 09:18:30 +0100
>> To: ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
>> Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] WinRT API support patch
>>
>> On 20 November 2014 08:34:54 CET, Jesse Jiang
>> wrote:
>>> Add WinR
;) == sizeof(seed))
> return seed;return get_generic_seed();}
>> From: jessejiang0...@outlook.com
>> To: ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
>> Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2014 03:51:12 +
>> Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] WinRT API support patch
>>
>> Hi All,
>>
") == sizeof(seed))return seed;
if (read_random(&seed, "/dev/random") == sizeof(seed))return seed;
return get_generic_seed();}
> From: jessejiang0...@outlook.com
> To: ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
> Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2014 03:51:12 +
> Subject: Re
any way to instead of srand(time(0)); rand(); ? How about c++11
or Mersenne twister Algorithmic
Best regards,Jesse
Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2014 02:49:59 +0100
From: michae...@gmx.at
To: ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] WinRT API support patch
On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 01:43:29AM +
On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 01:43:29AM +, Jesse Jiang wrote:
> Do you mean that we can use rand() instead of CryptGenRandom in ffmpeg?
rand() is completely wrong
its not even doing the correct operation
rand() is pseudo random
the code requires a strong (and non pseudo) random value
[...]
--
Mi
Do you mean that we can use rand() instead of CryptGenRandom in ffmpeg?
> Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2014 12:17:10 +0100
> From: j...@videolan.org
> To: ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
> Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] WinRT API support patch
>
> 1. libgcc is not big
> 2. MSVC 2013 has correct
a big library with our Apps.
I know the mingw is a correct way, but how could it works with MSVC?
Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2014 09:53:27 +0100
From: j...@videolan.org
To: ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] WinRT API support patch
On 20 Nov, Jesse Jiang wrote :
Add WinRT API sup
an.org
> To: ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
> Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] WinRT API support patch
>
> On 20 Nov, Jesse Jiang wrote :
> > Add WinRT API supports
>
> This patch is wrong on almost every level.
>
> rand() is wrong.
>
On 20 Nov, Jesse Jiang wrote :
> Add WinRT API supports
This patch is wrong on almost every level.
rand() is wrong.
modifying configure because your headers are broken is wrong too.
doing an API rewrapper in FFmpeg is the wrong place, look at
winstorecomp
function
> instead of it. If we use WinRT api to instead of these apis, it will cause
> more bugs.
> Best regards,Jesse
> > From: reimar.doeffin...@gmx.de
> > Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2014 09:18:30 +0100
> > To: ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
> > Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] WinRT API
.de
> Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2014 09:18:30 +0100
> To: ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
> Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] WinRT API support patch
>
> On 20 November 2014 08:34:54 CET, Jesse Jiang
> wrote:
> >Add WinRT API supports
>
> At least 2 fairly major is
On 20 November 2014 08:34:54 CET, Jesse Jiang
wrote:
>Add WinRT API supports
At least 2 fairly major issues:
1) using rand() basically never is correct. Use the appropriate
CryptographicBuffer function (yes, that means you need some C++ code
unfortunately).
2) CreateTh
12 matches
Mail list logo
