On Sat, Feb 18, 2023 at 12:18:57AM +0100, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 17, 2023 at 11:29:04PM +0100, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > On Fri, Feb 17, 2023 at 12:25:07PM -0600, Brad Isbell wrote:
> > > I think that if Trac ticket priority is to be used, it should first be
> > >
On Fri, Feb 17, 2023 at 11:29:04PM +0100, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> Hi
>
> On Fri, Feb 17, 2023 at 12:25:07PM -0600, Brad Isbell wrote:
> > I think that if Trac ticket priority is to be used, it should first be
> > working. Currently, if you try to vote on a ticket, a `500 Internal
> > Server
Hi
On Fri, Feb 17, 2023 at 12:25:07PM -0600, Brad Isbell wrote:
> I think that if Trac ticket priority is to be used, it should first be
> working. Currently, if you try to vote on a ticket, a `500 Internal
> Server Error` occurs in the background.
it seemed to work when i tryied but it seems tr
Michael Niedermayer:
> Hi
>
> Trac allows users to vote for tickets, should we bump tickets priority
> to important once they surpass some threshold of votes ?
> Should there be a difference betweem defects and enhancements ?
>
We are a project of volunteers, not a company where your boss can de
I think that if Trac ticket priority is to be used, it should first be
working. Currently, if you try to vote on a ticket, a `500 Internal
Server Error` occurs in the background.
I don't think that popularity of a ticket always indicates priority or
urgency. Security bugs are a good example... N
