Re: [FFmpeg-devel] RFC: new packed pixel formats (machine vision)

2024-10-25 Thread Diederick C. Niehorster
On Wed, Oct 23, 2024 at 2:04 AM martin schitter wrote: > > > > On 22.10.24 22:33, Diederick C. Niehorster wrote: > > I am writing about machine vision, not machine learning or computer > > vision. So there are no uncommon small bit sizes, we're dealing with > > 8bit, 10bit, 12bit components here.

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] RFC: new packed pixel formats (machine vision)

2024-10-22 Thread martin schitter
On 22.10.24 22:33, Diederick C. Niehorster wrote: I am writing about machine vision, not machine learning or computer vision. So there are no uncommon small bit sizes, we're dealing with 8bit, 10bit, 12bit components here. Sorry -- I'm such a sloppy reader/writer -- especially, when I'm hurr

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] RFC: new packed pixel formats (machine vision)

2024-10-22 Thread Diederick C. Niehorster
Hi Martin, Thanks for writing in! On Tue, Oct 22, 2024 at 11:41 AM martin schitter wrote: > > > > On 22.10.24 08:50, Diederick C. Niehorster wrote: > >> I want to pick up a discussion i started last week > >> (https://ffmpeg.org/pipermail/ffmpeg-devel/2024-October/334585.html) > >> in a new thre

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] RFC: new packed pixel formats (machine vision)

2024-10-22 Thread martin schitter
On 22.10.24 08:50, Diederick C. Niehorster wrote: I want to pick up a discussion i started last week (https://ffmpeg.org/pipermail/ffmpeg-devel/2024-October/334585.html) in a new thread, with the relevant information nicely organized. This is about adding pixel formats common in machine vision

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] RFC: new packed pixel formats (machine vision)

2024-10-21 Thread Diederick C. Niehorster
Ping. Is the below a viable scheme or are there concerns to consider in this initial design stage? Thanks and all the best, Dee On Tue, Oct 15, 2024 at 8:55 AM Diederick C. Niehorster wrote: > > Hi All, > > I want to pick up a discussion i started last week > (https://ffmpeg.org/pipermail/ffmpe