Re: [FFmpeg-devel] Initial tickering at unifying ProRes encoder

2024-01-10 Thread Clément Bœsch
On Sun, Dec 24, 2023 at 11:56:56AM +0100, Stefano Sabatini wrote: > On date Monday 2023-12-11 02:35:01 +0100, Clément Bœsch wrote: > > Hello there, > > > > I'm currently investigating an issue¹ affecting Kostya ProRes encoder > > which is not reproducible with Anatoliy encoder (but it's too early

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] Initial tickering at unifying ProRes encoder

2023-12-24 Thread Stefano Sabatini
On date Monday 2023-12-11 02:35:01 +0100, Clément Bœsch wrote: > Hello there, > > I'm currently investigating an issue¹ affecting Kostya ProRes encoder > which is not reproducible with Anatoliy encoder (but it's too early to > say if the bug is not present there as well given the differences in >

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] Initial tickering at unifying ProRes encoder

2023-12-11 Thread Clément Bœsch
On Mon, Dec 11, 2023 at 10:15:09AM +0100, Anton Khirnov wrote: > Quoting Clément Bœsch (2023-12-11 02:35:01) > > Hello there, > > > > I'm currently investigating an issue¹ affecting Kostya ProRes encoder > > which is not reproducible with Anatoliy encoder (but it's too early to > > say if the bug

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] Initial tickering at unifying ProRes encoder

2023-12-11 Thread Anton Khirnov
Quoting Clément Bœsch (2023-12-11 02:35:01) > Hello there, > > I'm currently investigating an issue¹ affecting Kostya ProRes encoder > which is not reproducible with Anatoliy encoder (but it's too early to > say if the bug is not present there as well given the differences in > quantization, and i