On Thu, Jul 07, 2022 at 10:47:57PM +0200, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 07, 2022 at 01:35:00PM +0200, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> > Hi all
> >
> > As was discussed previously the 5.1 release should be in june/july
> > That means in the next weeks probably!
> > If you know of any regres
Leo Izen:
> On 7/8/22 09:52, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
>> On Fri, Jul 08, 2022 at 10:36:54AM +0200, Jean-Baptiste Kempf wrote:
>>> On Thu, 7 Jul 2022, at 22:47, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
previosuly suggested names i found in my very unorgnaized notes:
Mellin, Gauss, Galois, Viterbi, Dar
On 7/8/22 09:52, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
On Fri, Jul 08, 2022 at 10:36:54AM +0200, Jean-Baptiste Kempf wrote:
On Thu, 7 Jul 2022, at 22:47, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
previosuly suggested names i found in my very unorgnaized notes:
Mellin, Gauss, Galois, Viterbi, Darwin, Von Neumann, lorentz
On Fri, Jul 08, 2022 at 10:36:54AM +0200, Jean-Baptiste Kempf wrote:
> On Thu, 7 Jul 2022, at 22:47, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> > previosuly suggested names i found in my very unorgnaized notes:
> > Mellin, Gauss, Galois, Viterbi, Darwin, Von Neumann, lorentz, poincaré,
> > desitter, de broglie
On 7/8/2022 7:23 AM, Timo Rothenpieler wrote:
On 08/07/2022 12:17, Timo Rothenpieler wrote:
The lavfi changes, more specifically wrapped_avframe, still rely on
sizeof(AVFrame) being used outside lavu. We really need to stop
spreading its use and find a way to change this behavior.
I have tri
On 08/07/2022 12:17, Timo Rothenpieler wrote:
The lavfi changes, more specifically wrapped_avframe, still rely on
sizeof(AVFrame) being used outside lavu. We really need to stop
spreading its use and find a way to change this behavior.
I have tried like two different solutions and both were reje
The lavfi changes, more specifically wrapped_avframe, still rely on
sizeof(AVFrame) being used outside lavu. We really need to stop
spreading its use and find a way to change this behavior.
I have tried like two different solutions and both were rejected, so
it's not going to be me.
wrapped_av
On Fri, Jul 8, 2022 at 10:37 AM Jean-Baptiste Kempf wrote:
> On Thu, 7 Jul 2022, at 22:47, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> > previosuly suggested names i found in my very unorgnaized notes:
> > Mellin, Gauss, Galois, Viterbi, Darwin, Von Neumann, lorentz, poincaré,
> > desitter, de broglie
>
> Did w
On Thu, 7 Jul 2022, at 22:47, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> previosuly suggested names i found in my very unorgnaized notes:
> Mellin, Gauss, Galois, Viterbi, Darwin, Von Neumann, lorentz, poincaré,
> desitter, de broglie
Did we not use Lorentz for 5.0? I'm ok for re-using it, though.
Else, I woul
On Sun, 19 Jun 2022, Neal Gompa wrote:
On Sun, Jun 19, 2022 at 4:59 PM Marton Balint wrote:
On Thu, 9 Jun 2022, Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 7, 2022 at 7:35 AM Michael Niedermayer
> wrote:
>>
>> Hi all
>>
>> As was discussed previously the 5.1 release should be in june/july
>> That
On 7/7/2022 5:51 PM, Timo Rothenpieler wrote:
On 07.07.2022 22:47, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
On Tue, Jun 07, 2022 at 01:35:00PM +0200, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
Hi all
As was discussed previously the 5.1 release should be in june/july
That means in the next weeks probably!
If you know of a
On 07.07.2022 22:47, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
On Tue, Jun 07, 2022 at 01:35:00PM +0200, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
Hi all
As was discussed previously the 5.1 release should be in june/july
That means in the next weeks probably!
If you know of any regressions, security issues or other major bu
On Tue, Jun 07, 2022 at 01:35:00PM +0200, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> Hi all
>
> As was discussed previously the 5.1 release should be in june/july
> That means in the next weeks probably!
> If you know of any regressions, security issues or other major bugs,
> please help fixing them
>
> Also a
On Sun, Jun 19, 2022 at 4:59 PM Marton Balint wrote:
>
>
>
> On Thu, 9 Jun 2022, Neal Gompa wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Jun 7, 2022 at 7:35 AM Michael Niedermayer
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi all
> >>
> >> As was discussed previously the 5.1 release should be in june/july
> >> That means in the next weeks pr
On Thu, 9 Jun 2022, Neal Gompa wrote:
On Tue, Jun 7, 2022 at 7:35 AM Michael Niedermayer
wrote:
Hi all
As was discussed previously the 5.1 release should be in june/july
That means in the next weeks probably!
If you know of any regressions, security issues or other major bugs,
please help
On Tue, Jun 7, 2022 at 7:35 AM Michael Niedermayer
wrote:
>
> Hi all
>
> As was discussed previously the 5.1 release should be in june/july
> That means in the next weeks probably!
> If you know of any regressions, security issues or other major bugs,
> please help fixing them
>
> Also as was sugg
16 matches
Mail list logo
