On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 12:51 PM, Ganesh Ajjanagadde wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 10:37 AM, Claudio Freire
> wrote:
>> So, here comes the discussion again.
>>
>> This time, the AAC encoder is in good shape. It's not perfect. I have
>> a list of known bugs to address that still has some issues,
On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 12:50 PM, Hendrik Leppkes wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 4:42 PM, Clément Bœsch wrote:
>> On Wed, Dec 02, 2015 at 12:37:00PM -0300, Claudio Freire wrote:
>>> So, here comes the discussion again.
>>>
>>> This time, the AAC encoder is in good shape. It's not perfect. I have
Dana 2. 12. 2015. 16:54 osoba "Nicolas George" napisala
je:
>
> Le duodi 12 frimaire, an CCXXIV, Ganesh Ajjanagadde a écrit :
> > He mentioned AAC due to some user's
> > complaints about quality on certain files. This was likely referring
> > to the decoder and not en
Le duodi 12 frimaire, an CCXXIV, Ganesh Ajjanagadde a écrit :
> He mentioned AAC due to some user's
> complaints about quality on certain files. This was likely referring
> to the decoder and not encoder.
I remember it about the MP3 decoder compared to libmp3, not AAC
On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 10:37 AM, Claudio Freire wrote:
> So, here comes the discussion again.
>
> This time, the AAC encoder is in good shape. It's not perfect. I have
> a list of known bugs to address that still has some issues, but I'm
> not really certain whether they should block the flag's re
On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 4:42 PM, Clément Bœsch wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 02, 2015 at 12:37:00PM -0300, Claudio Freire wrote:
>> So, here comes the discussion again.
>>
>> This time, the AAC encoder is in good shape. It's not perfect. I have
>> a list of known bugs to address that still has some issues,
On Wed, Dec 02, 2015 at 12:37:00PM -0300, Claudio Freire wrote:
> So, here comes the discussion again.
>
> This time, the AAC encoder is in good shape. It's not perfect. I have
> a list of known bugs to address that still has some issues, but I'm
> not really certain whether they should block the
