Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [RFC] Vote STF/SPI 2024-02

2024-02-11 Thread Michael Niedermayer
On Sun, Feb 04, 2024 at 01:42:31AM +0100, Michael Niedermayer wrote: > On Sat, Feb 03, 2024 at 04:37:54AM +0100, Michael Niedermayer wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 01, 2024 at 05:29:26AM +0100, Michael Niedermayer wrote: > > > Hi all > > > > > > To do the STF/SPI thing properly, and make sure we do what t

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [RFC] Vote STF/SPI 2024-02

2024-02-06 Thread Vittorio Giovara
On Thu, Feb 1, 2024 at 9:11 PM Rémi Denis-Courmont wrote: > Le torstaina 1. helmikuuta 2024, 19.45.52 EET Vittorio Giovara a écrit : > > The same of course should apply to any other future funding, it must be > > either the community (via GA) or a third party setting up the > sponsorship. > > Nei

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [RFC] Vote STF/SPI 2024-02

2024-02-04 Thread Paul B Mahol
On Sun, Feb 4, 2024 at 1:42 AM Michael Niedermayer wrote: > On Sat, Feb 03, 2024 at 04:37:54AM +0100, Michael Niedermayer wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 01, 2024 at 05:29:26AM +0100, Michael Niedermayer wrote: > > > Hi all > > > > > > To do the STF/SPI thing properly, and make sure we do what the > Commu

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [RFC] Vote STF/SPI 2024-02

2024-02-03 Thread Michael Niedermayer
On Sat, Feb 03, 2024 at 04:37:54AM +0100, Michael Niedermayer wrote: > On Thu, Feb 01, 2024 at 05:29:26AM +0100, Michael Niedermayer wrote: > > Hi all > > > > To do the STF/SPI thing properly, and make sure we do what the Community > > wants. > > We should do this vote: (unless lots of people rep

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [RFC] Vote STF/SPI 2024-02

2024-02-03 Thread Stefano Sabatini
On date Saturday 2024-02-03 04:37:54 +0100, Michael Niedermayer wrote: > On Thu, Feb 01, 2024 at 05:29:26AM +0100, Michael Niedermayer wrote: > > Hi all > > > > To do the STF/SPI thing properly, and make sure we do what the Community > > wants. > > We should do this vote: (unless lots of people r

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [RFC] Vote STF/SPI 2024-02

2024-02-02 Thread Michael Niedermayer
On Thu, Feb 01, 2024 at 05:29:26AM +0100, Michael Niedermayer wrote: > Hi all > > To do the STF/SPI thing properly, and make sure we do what the Community > wants. > We should do this vote: (unless lots of people reply and say we should skip > the vote) > (i am also CCing jonatan to make sure th

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [RFC] Vote STF/SPI 2024-02

2024-02-01 Thread Michael Niedermayer
Hi Jonatas On Thu, Feb 01, 2024 at 04:42:34PM -0300, Jonatas L. Nogueira via ffmpeg-devel wrote: [...] > Of course, if they voluntarily renounce the right to participate that's an > entirely different story. Anyone can do that, but that's entirely up to > them and trying to coerce them into doin

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [RFC] Vote STF/SPI 2024-02

2024-02-01 Thread Rémi Denis-Courmont
Le torstaina 1. helmikuuta 2024, 19.45.52 EET Vittorio Giovara a écrit : > The same of course should apply to any other future funding, it must be > either the community (via GA) or a third party setting up the sponsorship. Neither the community or the GA can forbid people from seeking funding for

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [RFC] Vote STF/SPI 2024-02

2024-02-01 Thread Jonatas L. Nogueira via ffmpeg-devel
> The same of course should apply to any other future funding, it must be either the community (via GA) or a third party setting up the sponsorship. I honestly didn't understood this part. Maybe because I'm not involved with FFmpeg internal workings and policies, but could you clarify the exact di

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [RFC] Vote STF/SPI 2024-02

2024-02-01 Thread Michael Niedermayer
On Thu, Feb 01, 2024 at 06:45:52PM +0100, Vittorio Giovara wrote: > On Thu, Feb 1, 2024 at 5:29 AM Michael Niedermayer > wrote: > > > Hi all > > > > To do the STF/SPI thing properly, and make sure we do what the Community > > wants. > > We should do this vote: (unless lots of people reply and say

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [RFC] Vote STF/SPI 2024-02

2024-02-01 Thread Cosmin Stejerean via ffmpeg-devel
> On Feb 1, 2024, at 9:45 AM, Vittorio Giovara > wrote: > > Since all objections and requests for more time have been ignored, and this > is happening anyway, can we add a small amendment for the sake of > transparency and for avoiding any conflict of interest? Whoever was > involved with the

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [RFC] Vote STF/SPI 2024-02

2024-02-01 Thread Vittorio Giovara
On Thu, Feb 1, 2024 at 5:29 AM Michael Niedermayer wrote: > Hi all > > To do the STF/SPI thing properly, and make sure we do what the Community > wants. > We should do this vote: (unless lots of people reply and say we should > skip the vote) > (i am also CCing jonatan to make sure the option in