Hi,
On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 7:55 AM, Ganesh Ajjanagadde
wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 12:29 AM, Michael Niedermayer
> wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 07:02:42PM -0400, Ganesh Ajjanagadde wrote:
> >> On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 3:05 PM, Ronald S. Bultje
> wrote:
> >> > Hi,
> >> >
> >> > On We
On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 12:29 AM, Michael Niedermayer
wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 07:02:42PM -0400, Ganesh Ajjanagadde wrote:
>> On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 3:05 PM, Ronald S. Bultje wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 2:46 PM, Ganesh Ajjanagadde
>> >
>> > wrote:
>> >>
>> >> On W
On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 07:02:42PM -0400, Ganesh Ajjanagadde wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 3:05 PM, Ronald S. Bultje wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 2:46 PM, Ganesh Ajjanagadde
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 2:39 PM, Ronald S. Bultje
> >> wrote:
> >> > Hi,
> >> >
On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 3:05 PM, Ronald S. Bultje wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 2:46 PM, Ganesh Ajjanagadde
> wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 2:39 PM, Ronald S. Bultje
>> wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 2:31 PM, Ganesh Ajjanagadde
>> >
>> > wrote:
>> >>
>> >> O
Hi,
On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 2:46 PM, Ganesh Ajjanagadde
wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 2:39 PM, Ronald S. Bultje
> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 2:31 PM, Ganesh Ajjanagadde <
> gajjanaga...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 11:38 AM, Ronald S. Bultje
>
On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 2:39 PM, Ronald S. Bultje wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 2:31 PM, Ganesh Ajjanagadde
> wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 11:38 AM, Ronald S. Bultje
>> wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 11:00 AM, Ganesh Ajjanagadde
>> > wrote:
>> >>
>> >> On W
Hi,
On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 2:31 PM, Ganesh Ajjanagadde
wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 11:38 AM, Ronald S. Bultje
> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 11:00 AM, Ganesh Ajjanagadde
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 10:53 AM, Ronald S. Bultje
> >> wrote:
> >> > Hi,
> >>
On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 11:33 AM, Hendrik Leppkes wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 4:00 PM, Ganesh Ajjanagadde
> wrote:
>> On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 10:53 AM, Ronald S. Bultje
>> wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 10:48 AM, Ganesh Ajjanagadde
>>> wrote:
On Wed, Oct 28, 2015
On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 11:44 AM, Clément Bœsch wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 10:34:37AM -0400, Ronald S. Bultje wrote:
> [...]
>> You could do the same for the last 4 values of the cinething changes, they
>> are clearly not enums, but flags. Flags are always unsigned, so if enums
>> are unsign
On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 11:38 AM, Ronald S. Bultje wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 11:00 AM, Ganesh Ajjanagadde
> wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 10:53 AM, Ronald S. Bultje
>> wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 10:48 AM, Ganesh Ajjanagadde
>> > wrote:
>> >>
>> >> On
On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 10:34:37AM -0400, Ronald S. Bultje wrote:
[...]
> You could do the same for the last 4 values of the cinething changes, they
> are clearly not enums, but flags. Flags are always unsigned, so if enums
> are unsigned and that causes an issue (as it does here), it makes sense t
Hi,
On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 11:00 AM, Ganesh Ajjanagadde wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 10:53 AM, Ronald S. Bultje
> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 10:48 AM, Ganesh Ajjanagadde
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 10:34 AM, Ronald S. Bultje
> >> wrote:
> >> > Hi,
> >
On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 4:00 PM, Ganesh Ajjanagadde
wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 10:53 AM, Ronald S. Bultje wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 10:48 AM, Ganesh Ajjanagadde
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 10:34 AM, Ronald S. Bultje
>>> wrote:
>>> > Hi,
>>> >
>>> > On Wed,
On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 10:53 AM, Ronald S. Bultje wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 10:48 AM, Ganesh Ajjanagadde
> wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 10:34 AM, Ronald S. Bultje
>> wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 8:20 AM, Ganesh Ajjanagadde
>> >
>> > wrote:
>> >>
>> >
Hi,
On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 10:48 AM, Ganesh Ajjanagadde wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 10:34 AM, Ronald S. Bultje
> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 8:20 AM, Ganesh Ajjanagadde <
> gajjanaga...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 7:00 AM, Ronald S. Bultje
>
On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 10:34 AM, Ronald S. Bultje wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 8:20 AM, Ganesh Ajjanagadde
> wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 7:00 AM, Ronald S. Bultje
>> wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 10:58 PM, Ganesh Ajjanagadde
>> > wrote:
>> >>
>> >> On T
Hi,
On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 8:20 AM, Ganesh Ajjanagadde
wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 7:00 AM, Ronald S. Bultje
> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 10:58 PM, Ganesh Ajjanagadde
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 10:41 PM, Ronald S. Bultje
> >> wrote:
> >> > Hi,
> >>
On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 7:00 AM, Ronald S. Bultje wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 10:58 PM, Ganesh Ajjanagadde
> wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 10:41 PM, Ronald S. Bultje
>> wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 8:53 PM, Ganesh Ajjanagadde
>> >
>> > wrote:
>> >>
>> >>
Hi,
On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 10:58 PM, Ganesh Ajjanagadde wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 10:41 PM, Ronald S. Bultje
> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 8:53 PM, Ganesh Ajjanagadde <
> gajjanaga...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> ISO C restricts enumerator values to the range of in
On Tue, 27 Oct 2015 20:53:39 -0400
Ganesh Ajjanagadde wrote:
> ISO C restricts enumerator values to the range of int. Thus (for instance)
> 0x8000
> unfortunately does not work, and throws a warning with -Wpedantic on
> clang 3.7.
>
> This fixes it by using alternative expressions that resu
On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 10:41 PM, Ronald S. Bultje wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 8:53 PM, Ganesh Ajjanagadde
> wrote:
>>
>> ISO C restricts enumerator values to the range of int. Thus (for instance)
>> 0x8000
>> unfortunately does not work, and throws a warning with -Wpedantic on
>
Hi,
On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 8:53 PM, Ganesh Ajjanagadde
wrote:
> ISO C restricts enumerator values to the range of int. Thus (for instance)
> 0x8000
> unfortunately does not work, and throws a warning with -Wpedantic on
> clang 3.7.
>
> This fixes it by using alternative expressions that res
On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 08:53:39PM -0400, Ganesh Ajjanagadde wrote:
> ISO C restricts enumerator values to the range of int. Thus (for instance)
> 0x8000
> unfortunately does not work, and throws a warning with -Wpedantic on
> clang 3.7.
>
> This fixes it by using alternative expressions that
23 matches
Mail list logo