Since Nicolas did not follow up, shall we go ahead and push this?
Something so simple really should not be stuck in place for a year.
--
Anton Khirnov
___
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
On 24 Feb 2022, at 14:46, Nicolas George wrote:
> Thilo Borgman (12022-02-24):
>> Both LGTM.
>
> Does it?
An earlier reply would have been helpful here, i.e. before an ACK rather than
after.
> The way I remember it, this condition was for the initial assembly, as a
> temporary measure. I mig
Thilo Borgman (12022-02-24):
> Both LGTM.
Does it?
The way I remember it, this condition was for the initial assembly, as a
temporary measure. I might have missed some steps, but I do not remember
we adopted this as a constant rule.
I see several flaws with it:
- Documentation patches were not
Am 16.02.22 um 02:49 schrieb J. Dekker:
This script generates the current general assembly voters according to
the criteria of '20 commits in the last 36 months'.
Signed-off-by: J. Dekker
---
doc/dev_community/community.md | 3 +++
tools/general_assembly.pl | 40 +++
