On Wed, 14 Mar 2018 16:02:36 -0300
James Almer wrote:
> On 3/14/2018 3:59 PM, wm4 wrote:
> > On Wed, 14 Mar 2018 14:45:33 -0300
> > James Almer wrote:
> >
> >> On 3/14/2018 1:41 PM, wm4 wrote:
> >>> On Wed, 14 Mar 2018 13:30:28 -0300
> >>> James Almer wrote:
> >>>
> On 3/14/2018
On 3/14/2018 3:59 PM, wm4 wrote:
> On Wed, 14 Mar 2018 14:45:33 -0300
> James Almer wrote:
>
>> On 3/14/2018 1:41 PM, wm4 wrote:
>>> On Wed, 14 Mar 2018 13:30:28 -0300
>>> James Almer wrote:
>>>
On 3/14/2018 12:51 PM, wm4 wrote:
> On Wed, 14 Mar 2018 12:30:04 -0300
> James Alme
On Wed, 14 Mar 2018 14:45:33 -0300
James Almer wrote:
> On 3/14/2018 1:41 PM, wm4 wrote:
> > On Wed, 14 Mar 2018 13:30:28 -0300
> > James Almer wrote:
> >
> >> On 3/14/2018 12:51 PM, wm4 wrote:
> >>> On Wed, 14 Mar 2018 12:30:04 -0300
> >>> James Almer wrote:
> >>>
> Same use cas
On 3/14/2018 1:41 PM, wm4 wrote:
> On Wed, 14 Mar 2018 13:30:28 -0300
> James Almer wrote:
>
>> On 3/14/2018 12:51 PM, wm4 wrote:
>>> On Wed, 14 Mar 2018 12:30:04 -0300
>>> James Almer wrote:
>>>
Same use case as av_fast_malloc(). If the buffer passed to it is
writable and big enoug
On Wed, 14 Mar 2018 13:30:28 -0300
James Almer wrote:
> On 3/14/2018 12:51 PM, wm4 wrote:
> > On Wed, 14 Mar 2018 12:30:04 -0300
> > James Almer wrote:
> >
> >> Same use case as av_fast_malloc(). If the buffer passed to it is
> >> writable and big enough it will be reused, otherwise a new one
On 3/14/2018 12:51 PM, wm4 wrote:
> On Wed, 14 Mar 2018 12:30:04 -0300
> James Almer wrote:
>
>> Same use case as av_fast_malloc(). If the buffer passed to it is
>> writable and big enough it will be reused, otherwise a new one will
>> be allocated instead.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: James Almer
>> --
On Wed, 14 Mar 2018 12:30:04 -0300
James Almer wrote:
> Same use case as av_fast_malloc(). If the buffer passed to it is
> writable and big enough it will be reused, otherwise a new one will
> be allocated instead.
>
> Signed-off-by: James Almer
> ---
> TODO: Changelog and APIChanges entries, v
