Hi Martin
On Fri, Oct 11, 2024 at 04:12:54PM +0200, Martin Schitter wrote:
> On 11.10.24 10:57, Anton Khirnov wrote:
[...]
> But I immediately stumbled again over another nasty swscale related bug! :(
>
> Just try it yourself:
>
> First make a simple test with my last posted patch set:
>
> ./
On 11.10.24 10:57, Anton Khirnov wrote:
It seems rather obvious to me - you're making a demuxer export something
that IS raw video, yet you're tagging it as a new codec ID with a new
decoder that (for these specific pixel format) duplicates what the
rawvideo decoder does.
Just to be clear, I
Quoting Martin Schitter (2024-10-11 03:08:23)
> On 10.10.24 14:13, Anton Khirnov wrote:
> > I've already commented on this in a previous version - this should be
> > directly exported as rawvideo by the demuxer rather than requiring a
> > special encoder.
>
>
> hmm -- you touched this topic once
On 10.10.24 14:13, Anton Khirnov wrote:
Quoting Martin Schitter (2024-10-10 04:58:40)
+static int pass_though(AVCodecContext *avctx, AVFrame *frame, const AVPacket
*avpkt)
+{
+/* there is no need to copy as the data already match
+ * a known pixel format */
+
+frame->buf[0] = av_
Quoting Martin Schitter (2024-10-10 04:58:40)
> +static int pass_though(AVCodecContext *avctx, AVFrame *frame, const AVPacket
> *avpkt)
> +{
> +/* there is no need to copy as the data already match
> + * a known pixel format */
> +
> +frame->buf[0] = av_buffer_ref(avpkt->buf);
> +
> +
