> From: "Paul B Mahol"
> To: "FFmpeg development discussions and patches"
> Cc: "Damien Riegel" , "Patrick Keroulas"
>
> Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2018 2:47:40 AM
> Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH v1 2/3] avcodec/bitpacked: add i
On 10 April 2018 at 22:21, Patrick Keroulas <
patrick.kerou...@savoirfairelinux.com> wrote:
> From: Damien Riegel
>
> This codec is already capable of depacking some combinations of pixel
> formats and depth as defined in the RFC4175. The only difference between
> progressive and interlace is tha
On 10 April 2018 at 22:21, Patrick Keroulas <
patrick.kerou...@savoirfairelinux.com> wrote:
> From: Damien Riegel
>
> This codec is already capable of depacking some combinations of pixel
> formats and depth as defined in the RFC4175. The only difference between
> progressive and interlace is tha
On 4/10/18, Patrick Keroulas wrote:
> From: Damien Riegel
>
> This codec is already capable of depacking some combinations of pixel
> formats and depth as defined in the RFC4175. The only difference between
> progressive and interlace is that either a packet will contain the whole
> frame, or onl
