On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 02:57:43PM +0100, wm4 wrote:
> On Thu, 12 Feb 2015 14:25:41 +0100
> Michael Niedermayer wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Feb 09, 2015 at 08:39:01PM +0100, wm4 wrote:
> > > Just because the user requested the seek index to be ignored, we can't
> > > just skip essential headers. At leas
On Thu, 12 Feb 2015 14:25:41 +0100
Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 09, 2015 at 08:39:01PM +0100, wm4 wrote:
> > Just because the user requested the seek index to be ignored, we can't
> > just skip essential headers. At least tags are often located at the end
> > of the file, and the old
On Mon, Feb 09, 2015 at 08:39:01PM +0100, wm4 wrote:
> Just because the user requested the seek index to be ignored, we can't
> just skip essential headers. At least tags are often located at the end
> of the file, and the old code simply ignored the seekhead for all
> elements, not just the cue in
